Talk:The Sacred and the Profane
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
		
	
presumably v. popularized?  I'm not sure Eliade actually coined either of these terms, but he was the first to really get them into philosophical talk.  is "popularized" the better term?-- En attendant Godot"«I don't think in any language. I think in images.   V.Nabokov» 12:28, 3 March 2009 (EST)
En attendant Godot"«I don't think in any language. I think in images.   V.Nabokov» 12:28, 3 March 2009 (EST)
Capital letters[edit]
Are they necessary? Is this a book? If not, it's a lot easier for the search bar if the words sacred and profane were lower case.--"Shut up, Brx." 23:49, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- It is the title of a book by Mircea Eliade, although Wikipedia says that Emile Durkheim, one of the three granddaddies of sociology, made much of the concept before Eliade did.  ListenerXTalkerX 02:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC) ListenerXTalkerX 02:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)- I largely rewrote the beginning because while there is some concept by Durkhiem, it's largely fleshed out by Eliade, and this specific title is a book.  If someone wants to retitle it to be just "sacred" or something, that would be workable.  But as it stands, it's not really about Durkheim, and I'm unconvinced his writings are really all that developed though they clearly are the seeds for Eliade, by his own words.-- GodotL'important c'est d'aimer  15:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC) GodotL'important c'est d'aimer  15:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 
- I largely rewrote the beginning because while there is some concept by Durkhiem, it's largely fleshed out by Eliade, and this specific title is a book.  If someone wants to retitle it to be just "sacred" or something, that would be workable.  But as it stands, it's not really about Durkheim, and I'm unconvinced his writings are really all that developed though they clearly are the seeds for Eliade, by his own words.--