2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:The Washington Times

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon media.svg

This Media related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

Echo chamber[edit]

While trawling moonie info, I've seen many articles on the WTs role in the right-wing media echo-chamber. I will see if I can add a suitably succint section about this. Fox 07:53, 2 May 2008 (EDT)

Comparisons to the CSM[edit]

I'd say the Christian Science Monitor is a pretty good source for news. I am well-aware of the absurd foundations of the Christian Science movement, but I'm re-phrasing that. --TheLateGatsby (The end of the dock ) 17:45, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

How does this have "highly factual" on mediabiasfactcheck.com?[edit]

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2016/12/05/daily-source-bias-check-washington-times/—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk) 14:37, 12 June 2017 (UTC)