There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Theophagy
"eating the religion"[edit]
I think it would actually parse as "eating the religion". Wouldn't "god eating" be deiphagy? I may be wrong... ħuman 21:47, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
- Wikipedia seems to go with theophagy. ThunderkatzHo! 22:13, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
- You're quoting a wiki that is considering making Ed Poor a sysop? Silly Katz! ħuman
22:26, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
- But, but, it has liberal bias, so it must be true! ThunderkatzHo! 22:31, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
- But, but, but, geophage! I loves me them dirt-eating fish!!! ħuman
01:41, 18 July 2008 (EDT)
- But, but, but, geophage! I loves me them dirt-eating fish!!! ħuman
- But, but, it has liberal bias, so it must be true! ThunderkatzHo! 22:31, 17 July 2008 (EDT)
- You're quoting a wiki that is considering making Ed Poor a sysop? Silly Katz! ħuman
Aztecs is a name contrived by Mexican nationalists for the Mexica in 1821. Seems they were disturbed by the primitive association. Mexica and Nahua would both be correct. Thorvelden (talk)
Wasn't there this weird Coconut Cult?[edit]
That claimed Coconuts were divine and ate them and basically nothing else? Pizzameister (talk) 21:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)