There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:We the People Act
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This would seem to a completely unenforceable law, like anything that limits judicial review. Has there been any constitutional analysis on it? EVDebs (talk) 04:25, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- I thought we were going to have someone lawyery to look into this. I can't remember who. - π 04:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Even speaking as an unAmerican, I can't see how this doesn't trivially fail constitutional muster - David Gerard (talk) 12:02, 27 June 2010 (UTC)