RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2835Goal: $5000

Template talk:Atheism

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

br[edit]

It looks like:

Articles to not believe
in

- not balanced - David Gerard (talk) 11:57, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Browser differences? It looks perfect here... 75.219.230.162 (talk) 12:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
It's centred, but there's a lot more words in the first line than the second - David Gerard (talk) 12:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
It's only one line here. Hence I think your browser is mangling it. 75.219.230.162 (talk) 12:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
I found a template at wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Line_break_handling and copied it over. Prometheus (talk) 12:47, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Firefox with out-the-box defaults on Ubuntu 10.04.
As a single line it's right up against the edges of the template, as the widest thing in it. I've put in a line break so there's some space around it. Graphic design, it's difficult with HTML but some bits are easy - David Gerard (talk) 12:54, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Why is it "the idiot's guide to Atheism"? I don't think that really sums up our articles very well at all. WeaseloidWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to change, it's based on the series of books. I just got tired of the "part of the series on" headers. How about getting rid of it changing the "Atheism" box to say "Atheism(br)explained"? ħumanUser talk:Human 19:29, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
I kinda liked this, Weasel. ħumanUser talk:Human 01:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Expand a bit???[edit]

I think that Secular Humanism and Empiricism should also be "key concepts" and in the appropriate category because they give a much broader picture of Atheism. They both seem too important to leave out to me, and since their is no related template like "Irreligion", I think this one should be more comprehensive.--CentimeterINCHES 00:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

I swapped Sh for humanism and fixed the categories. I'm not a big fan of these "key concepts" sections though, they tend to make the template a bit large. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:17, 3 August 2010 (UTC)