RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3630Goal: $5000

Template talk:Crebox

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
  1. This is the ugliest nav template I have seen.
  2. It is actually, for somewhat related reasons, physically painful.

WalkerWalkerWalker 10:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Ye largely-symbolic-and-not-really-necessary-these-days supernatural entities, that's terrible! BicyclewheelModerator 11:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Well, unless He is recreating everything every instant, of course. WalkerWalkerWalker 12:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
I thought he stopped doing that last Thursday. BicyclewheelModerator 12:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Nearly three weeks later[edit]

Betterified, and that shade of purply blue is awesome. So there. BicyclewheelModerator 21:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Wow, that purple is really burning my retinas. Ugh. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Your retinas clearly lack awesomeness. Get new ones from Doctor Bates. Also, check the code for that colour. BicyclewheelModerator 21:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
By the way, is there a way to make the left column less wide? The proportions seem kinda unbalanced at the moment. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 21:40, 5 September 42015 AQD (UTC)
You can reset the "cat1ind" "cat2ind" etc to another number. Just make sure to make them all the same or you'll have an uneven left border and the world will end. BicyclewheelModerator 22:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Lol, the subsections were indented because they were subsections. (eg, creationists indented 0, AIG indented 1). And the bar was black because the creationnav box is black. FuzzyCatPotato of the Trusty Beans (talk/stalk) 23:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Isn't there a less ugly way to show "this is a subsection of this" in a template? How does Wikipedia do it? 142.124.55.236 (talk) 23:46, 5 September 42015 AQD (UTC)
Often, they don't.Wikipedia's W.svg But I think it can be very useful -- the logical fallacy template is a good example, where informal fallacies are all indented under the informal fallacy tab. FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 23:52, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Ah, this is how they do it. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 23:57, 5 September 42015 AQD (UTC)
If you wanna write the template, be my guest. FuzzyCatPotato of the Congruent Xanthochrois (talk/stalk) 00:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, about that... *backs away slowly* 142.124.55.236 (talk) 01:23, 6 September 42015 AQD (UTC)
Hehe. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 03:41, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Intelligent Geography[edit]

Shouldn't "Intelligent geography" (Flat earth) be added to the intelligent alternatives? I don't want to add it because the template is used on so many articles. Christopher (talk) 12:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC)