There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Template talk:Global flood
Hey Ice, why do you think this is breaking the pages it's on? Perhaps an unclosed tag? humanbe in 17:09, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
The new Floodnva template is prettier, & has the added advantage of not breaking stuff. This one should probably be deleted as an unused spare. WěǎšěǐǒǐďMethinks it is a Weasel 21:40, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- Yes, it is, but this one has a better title. Let's move the page over this one and merge the meaningless chatter? ħuman
21:45, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- The somethingnav seems to becoming a standard around here. I say we just delete this. Can it just be done or do we have to wait for one of AKJ's quorums to be formed? - User 23:37, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- No, somethingnav tends to be the horizontal boxes at the bottom. The vertical ones usually have on-topic names (and it's not really a "navbox" if it only lists some random articles. A real "navbox" lists them all. Geddit? ħuman
23:47, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- No, somethingnav tends to be the horizontal boxes at the bottom. The vertical ones usually have on-topic names (and it's not really a "navbox" if it only lists some random articles. A real "navbox" lists them all. Geddit? ħuman
- The somethingnav seems to becoming a standard around here. I say we just delete this. Can it just be done or do we have to wait for one of AKJ's quorums to be formed? - User 23:37, 2 February 2009 (EST)
Talk from the predecessor[edit]
Perhaps the "water" motif could be a light green? I can grab the code for colors in the little image and try it if you like... ħuman 20:51, 2 February 2009 (EST)
- Yeah, go for it. Wěǎšěǐǒǐď
Methinks it is a Weasel 21:02, 2 February 2009 (EST)
DPL Issues[edit]
Why would take pages be included in the DPL of this template? [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 02:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Because of how I had to make the "priority" setting of Template:Rated (which is on the talk page, while article categories are only on the page itself) and Template:Category work together. This could be resolved if we started using
{{pri}}
instead, as I've proposed again. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 02:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)