Template talk:Global flood

Hey Ice, why do you think this is breaking the pages it's on? Perhaps an unclosed tag? human^{be in} 17:09, 27 July 2007 (CDT)

The new Floodnva template is prettier, & has the added advantage of not breaking stuff. This one should probably be deleted as an unused spare. Ŵêâŝêîôîď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:40, 2 February 2009 (EST)

Yes, it is, but this one has a better title. Let's move the page over this one and merge the meaningless chatter? ħuman 21:45, 2 February 2009 (EST)

The somethingnav seems to becoming a standard around here. I say we just delete this. Can it just be done or do we have to wait for one of AKJ's quorums to be formed? - User $\pi$ 23:37, 2 February 2009 (EST)

No, somethingnav tends to be the horizontal boxes at the bottom. The vertical ones usually have on-topic names (and it's not really a "navbox" if it only lists some random articles. A real "navbox" lists them all. Geddit? ħuman 23:47, 2 February 2009 (EST)

Talk from the predecessor

Perhaps the "water" motif could be a light green? I can grab the code for colors in the little image and try it if you like... ħuman 20:51, 2 February 2009 (EST)

Yeah, go for it. Ŵêâŝêîôîď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:02, 2 February 2009 (EST)

DPL Issues

Why would take pages be included in the DPL of this template? [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 02:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Because of how I had to make the "priority" setting of Template:Rated (which is on the talk page, while article categories are only on the page itself) and Template:Category work together. This could be resolved if we started using {{pri}} instead, as I've proposed again. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 02:39, 2 December 2015 (UTC)