Template talk:Sources needed

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Title: one that no one will ever remember. How about "sources needed"? ħumanUser talk:Human 04:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

That seems fine to me. Lyra § talk 04:30, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Or in RW internet slang "moar sauces plz" Scarlet A.pngd hominem 08:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Let's go easy with this template, I know we want sources, but many articles are simply written by people who know what they are talking about. There might be be better, subtler ways to get sources.[citation needed] ħumanUser talk:Human 09:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, though this is useful for flagging up ones that are either A) completely devoid of refs and further reading (I have to say that I'm more for "further reading" than I am for referenced statements), such as the Nietzsche one I just added it to as a test or B) are complete fact-tag soup, which I don't think we have because we're often a little sparse with that. Scarlet A.pngd hominem 09:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Hate this template[edit]

It doesn't say what needs to be cited. TyAnnoy 18:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Everything, surely? Peter Monomorium antarcticum 18:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
It's slightly cleaner than making {{fact}}-soup out of an article. Scarlet A.pngnarchist 18:59, 8 February 2012 (UTC)