2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Template talk:Welkome

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Someone is convinced that there are already too many editors here... ;-) Editor at CPfor a change 09:30, 7 April 2008 (EDT)

Just covering our Asses! SusanG 09:34, 7 April 2008 (EDT)

Delete[edit]

Personal vanity template, that does not further the goals of RW at all, just the ranting of one user. Serves no general good... ħumanUser talk:Human 02:16, 29 July 2008 (EDT)

Look @ the history, it's got your input. SusanG  ContribsTalk 02:19, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
Er, to fix the width? It's junk, delete it, or defend it. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:22, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
No to add contewnt SusanG  ContribsTalk 02:26, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
Looks like I mostly reduced cwowntwewnt? Anyway, this template is silly. ħumanUser talk:Human 02:40, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
Look H, we all know that you're always right so delete it. SusanG  ContribsTalk 02:41, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
Oh, let's have cup of tea and reconsider ;) I be gone for mine... ħumanUser talk:Human 02:43, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
AND if you stick things on a template that's transcluded, as this one is, then PLEASE noinclude 'em. SusanG  ContribsTalk 10:26, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
I must say this template doesn't do a lot for me.--Bobbing up 10:37, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

As there's been no action, I suggest removing the delete template, even if this doesn't get used again. WėąṣėḷőįďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 19:54, 22 January 2009 (EST)

Well, the template is there if someone wants to use it. If they don't want to use it, they don't use it. So I assume keep? ArmondikoVpathetic 09:09, 23 January 2009 (EST)
This is way better than the welcome/IP one. I'm using this one from now on for anonymous editors. - User 09:18, 23 January 2009 (EST)