There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Template talk:Welkome
Someone is convinced that there are already too many editors here... ;-) Editor at CPfor a change 09:30, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
- Just covering our Asses! SusanG 09:34, 7 April 2008 (EDT)
Delete[edit]
Personal vanity template, that does not further the goals of RW at all, just the ranting of one user. Serves no general good... ħuman 02:16, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- Look @ the history, it's got your input.
ContribsTalk 02:19, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- Er, to fix the width? It's junk, delete it, or defend it. ħuman
02:22, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- No to add contewnt
ContribsTalk 02:26, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- Looks like I mostly reduced cwowntwewnt? Anyway, this template is silly. ħuman
02:40, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
- Looks like I mostly reduced cwowntwewnt? Anyway, this template is silly. ħuman
- No to add contewnt
- Er, to fix the width? It's junk, delete it, or defend it. ħuman
As there's been no action, I suggest removing the delete template, even if this doesn't get used again. WėąṣėḷőįďMethinks it is a Weasel 19:54, 22 January 2009 (EST)
- Well, the template is there if someone wants to use it. If they don't want to use it, they don't use it. So I assume keep? ArmondikoVpathetic 09:09, 23 January 2009 (EST)
- This is way better than the welcome/IP one. I'm using this one from now on for anonymous editors. - User 09:18, 23 January 2009 (EST)