Template talk:Wpl

I like the look of this, but I would like it more if the text format was slightly different than just plain text, so you know what term the WP link is for before clicking on it or mousing over it. Maybe a different color or something? I'm not sure, really. Some ideas would be appreciated. Cow...Hammer^time! 16:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Make it green. Тy^talk 21:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

The light-valued "dim gray" helped a bit. but may have been too odd-looking for some eyes. I want to try some low-saturation colors, along with slight changes in value. If I find something that seems to make visual sense, I will roll it down the alley and see how many pins fall over. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 10:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

How does this color look?

How does this color look?

How does this color look?

Naturally, there are other possibilities. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 13:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

I got impatient and changed it to the first one, the greenish grey, since that isn't likely to be confused with red links, blue links, or visited links, which show up on my screen as some sort of purple. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 00:05, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

https

I believe some mediawiki internals are used, but ideally these outgoing links would be https. Not sure where to set this though Deku-shrub (talk) 17:47, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Use of icon

These are the guidelines which show this is the appropriate use of the Wikipedia icon. Deku-shrub (talk) 13:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Lololololol

@LosCocinados hit "Show Preview" my friend. That way you can tell if an edit breaks the formatting. - Rairyu75 (Talk) 19:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

My bad I did not realize template:wplang exists. LosCocinados (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)