There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Attack pages allowed?
We don't overtly allow attack pages, but we do allow for a different standard of article than Wikipedia does. Personally, I have no vested interest in the article as of yet, but I'm sure others do. If you want to go back to your version, so be it. I just offer no assurances against others reverting you. Which is why I am pushing the talkpage discussion route.
And while we don't generally have a rule on sourcing things, I would add that if you wish to source your points in the article, that may actually help your case better.
Thanks. Really very much appreciated. I don't mind people seeing nonsense about me on kook sites, that's par for the course, but this was a bit embarrassing and could have been fodder to use against me. Interesting, my talk page has attracted an IP attacking me, Par for the course I guess.
Trolling IPs are always par for the course around this place. Sorry about all that huff and confusion yesterday.
Dynamiclear were relatively reasonable, too. Can't think of many others.
Yeah, usually they are like Ramanand Jhingade and pull the legal threats out instantly upon arrival.