Boycott

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Did you intend to turn that on? Or just wandalism?

Colonel Sanders (talk)19:15, 12 June 2011

The boycott is always on. Always.

ТyTalk.19:15, 12 June 2011

Yup. It is. I just meant that IP that messed with the switch.

Colonel Sanders (talk)19:21, 12 June 2011

I know. I returned it to it's proper state.

ТyTalk.19:22, 12 June 2011

Thank you for flipping the switch. But is it legit this time? Is RW actually boycotting CONservapedia? Could it be my dream come true?

A few people are actually taking the boycott seriously for once. And no problem about that :)

ТyTalk.12:07, 13 June 2011

Really? Where are these people taking it seriously? I see one post saying "forget about it" and another saying that you, or your sock, is just being silly. It's already been mentioned that boycotts serve no purpose, so why persist?

OompaLoompa (talk)12:14, 13 June 2011

Because it annoys the CP-watching people.

ТyTalk.12:17, 13 June 2011
 

Boycotts do serve a psychological purpose. They confuse the enemy and, at the same time, make us look innocent.

Maybe they make you look innocent, but as usual, I'm called an off -my-meds stalker. Again. I miss Armondikov.

ТyTalk.16:54, 13 June 2011