There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:174.82.169.215
Yeah, if you want to alter content to make the article tell a completely different story, you discuss those changes in the talk page. Pushing for your POV shift isn't gonna do you any good. Either way, I doubt your edits are going to get accepted given the nature of this wiki debunking pseudoscience (which you push), but I guess it doesn't hurt trying. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 20:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- My response:
- Okay. My apologies. I did not realize the nature of Rational Wiki is to debunk things. I won't attempt to edit that article anymore, although I could provide sources for the content I was adding to you personally if you'd be interested? I'll leave the article as is. But, would it be possible for me to get my IP address unblocked so I can create an account? I'm generally a skeptic and I would like to help debunk certain things. I understand my views on the Paracas skulls won't be accepted by a community which aims to debunk things. I wasn't aware of the nature of this site, that's all. Thanks for your time. — Unsigned, by: 174.82.169.215 / talk