User talk:50.92.77.2

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, 50.92.77.2. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

Unless you've got good evidence for gray aliens' existence please stop editing the article to say they exist. Christopher (talk) 11:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

...And now you are blocked for this very reason. Feel free to post links to those sources here, since you are able to edit your own talkpage while blocked. Hertzy (talk) 12:00, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

I've unblocked you for now, don't edit the article like that again though. Christopher (talk) 12:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

https://s21.postimg.org/dplr7m113/Screen_Shot_2017-07-02_at_5.07.53_AM.png

you blocked me after i already re-made the change and didn't receive your message.

Unless you have got good evidence that grays dont exist, please stop saying in the article they are a figment of people's imaginations. I can easily suggest, "everyone knows that bug's create an imaginary blinding light when you have one, any one, in your sight. The sun seems to only be seen exactly as this is happening.

−

Characterists:

Big, bright. Floats through the sky.

Btw

Pwnt

---

who are you anyway?^{— Unsigned, by: 50.92.77.2 / talk / contribs}

That is not how the Burden of proof works around here. You claim the grays exist, so it's your job to bring the proof to the table. That said, the moon has no atmosphere and none of the photographs of the moon's surface including ones taken by people actually walking on the moon's surface show any sign of habitation, by the grays or otherwise. Please pardon my itchy blocking finger, the timing was tighter than I initially thought it was. And sign your commenst with four tildes (~~~~) on talk pages. Hertzy (talk) 12:19, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: on the toolbar above the edit panel. (You can indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line.) Thank you. Christopher (talk) 12:22, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello. My apologies. But I think we had fun rather than stress. I did not realize this was 'rational' wiki, as wikipedia states it is based on disproving paranormal things. But I know you do it in a way of trying to be logical. So that is why I thought i was on wiki, which I felt the article was biased. G'day 50.92.77.2 (talk) 12:42, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

"But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink! (I think?) I have no idea what you just said and you still haven't provided evidence for gray aliens. Christopher (talk) 12:49, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

I said when i first clicked a link that lead to the gray page, i initially thought I was on regular wikipedia. After recieving your messages and looking closely at the link that i clicked, it was 'rationalwiki'. And wikipedia, the regular one, if you look up 'what is rational wiki' will say it is based on disproving pseudoscience.

So of course it is alright for you guys to say grays arent real. The real scientists won't though. Many a time scientists only discover something because they were open to experimenting. Why shoot an electron through a tube? Surely it will just hit the wall and these dumb scientists are morons? What? our consciousness changes the behaviour?? WHAATT??? "

The most logical thing is to accept you aren't sure. Half the time you will dismiss true, and yes, *strange* things, as false, and would that make you incorrect? Yes. And if logic is based off of how the universe's laws and existence actually is, then it would also make you illogical.50.92.77.2 (talk) 13:05, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

1) Unless you define all scientists who don't believe in grays as "not real scientists" the overwhelming majority of scientists don't believe in grays.

2) Consciousness doesn't "change behaviour" if you mean what I think you mean.

3) Of course we can never be 100% sure about anything, how you go from that to "grays are real" I don't know. Christopher (talk) 13:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

True. Personal experience and suggestion of factors suggest high chance of gray activity. The Sun and moon are nearly the exactly angular diameter in the sky. The chance of that occurring naturally, is incredibly rare. The chance of that occuring on the one planet with life that we are sure has life on it, is much rarer. Our visions is our biggest sense, and the moon being the same size as the sun would have large changes on our perception. Causing us to think 'equality'. And 'beauty' and even 'divine' things. Basically, making the 'genes' on the planet superior. The next point is that humans are a lot different than the rest of the animals. It's something we are all blind to. Yet it's so in our face. That we are part alien. "Oh, those are animals son. They are wild beasts." It's so in our face, something we have always been aware of. We are intelligent. But we didn't know how come. A giraffe walks on fours, eats random things it finds, a tiger walks on fours, eats random things. A mouse scurries for food. A wolf hunts. A human speculates that aliens are watching them.

These 2 points, to me are quite apparent. If you heard the initial recordings of armstrong on the moon, from stations who received their signals, armstong said "Their babies are bigger than ours!" (Reffering to 'ships'). He said other obvious things, I can't remember exactly but basically "They are here and they want us to leave". Not even exagerating.

The government tries really hard to cover it all up, alien existence. Maybe the masses can't handle it.

The next point, even though grays originated from the book "Men on the Moon" or something or other, it's a strange anomoly that the 1 species humans keep on encountering, is the same exact one. Big head, big eyes, skinny body, short. Gray to yellow.

It would be obvious that they and mostly they would be visiting us here, if they were the ones who infused their DNA into 10 million year old Chimps.

They must have some hope for us. Which is terrible to me. But something that I'm trying to see the goodness in. To be a 'experiment'. You know ;) ?

I might have seen a gray telepathically. Not astrally as many claim, or in my dream. Yes they speak telepathically. Everything is interconnected 1 billion times more than scientists know. This is why I don't care about scientists. I know much more than them.

Fin.

Like I said not proof. 50.92.77.2 (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2017 (UTC) Sorry if that was a lot to take in50.92.77.2 (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

So basically "a coincidence that's unlikely happened (the sun/moon thing) , therefore aliens", "we're the smartest animal, therefore aliens", "I claim Armstrong said something when he landed on the moon but haven't provided any evidence, therefore aliens", "many people have similar delusions and there's no way they weren't both influenced by previous stories of alien encounters, therefore aliens", and finally "I claim to have spoken telepathically with aliens and there is no possibility that I'm wrong, therefore aliens". I have to say I'm convinced. Christopher (talk) 14:12, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

You've almost certainly gone but...

You've been featured on FSTDT. Christopher (talk) 18:07, 5 July 2017 (UTC)