User talk:CheeseburgerFace/Archive1

This is an archive page, last updated 27 November 2018. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:  , (new)(back)

Welcome

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, CheeseburgerFace! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

I wanted to post the welcome notice! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 18:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! —127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 00:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Laci Green

Holy crap actual content instead of hate. Thank you mate. Zero ^{(talk - contributions)} 09:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Another Red menace has been eliminated.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 04:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!— —127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 05:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Don't miss voting!

Here (since you said you liked my version better). All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Done —127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 19:16, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Demoted.

You can has sysop. Don't make a cunt of yourself and so on. Fine print can be found here. --MtD^Bogan 01:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

I'll grab my mop. —127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 02:43, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Revdelling

You don't have to revdel every single act of vandalism. Only things that absolutely shouldn't be in the history (e.g., doxing) need to be hidden; the rest can be left visible.--JorisEnter (talk) 18:56, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Okay.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 18:57, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Fun:The world as a RW talk page

Thank you for editing it! I hope you continue to -⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 08:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

General idea

If you find something that looks cranky but is borderline, you can create it in your userspace. EG: User:CheeseburgerFace/randomarticlename The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 03:12, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 05:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for endorsing me!

I've endorsed you back. Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays! -⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 21:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome. Any thank you as well!—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 03:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Merging Sarah Andersen and Fun:Sarah Andersen

Any thoughts on having three columns? αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 18:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Merge it to fun. It does't belong in mainspace. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 18:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Agreed.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 18:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Sounds good. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 19:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

China and "Shina"

Hi, I'm just referring to the recent edit by User:10101 on the China article. There are many names for ancient China and is not limited to Zhina [1]. The term as described is largely used by the Japanese, and is largely not used today due to bad blood between the two after WWII. Judging by the user's edit history and edit war on the Reddit article, I suspect he is engaging in POV pushing.--Alpharius (talk) 05:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

I feel the need to step in and defend myself here. I linked to an article where Zhina is used in a largely historical context but you obviously saw fit to delete it. "Zhina" is a phonetic transcription; in fact it's the anti-racist term for the country we call China and was even suggested by Sun Yat-Sen as a modern name. Zhong-guo is the racist, ethnocentric term; Zhina is the politically neutral term. I think you're the one pushing the POV here 10101 (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

A claim that no respected Sinologist or Chinese historians support. Go back to your shitty Reddits.--Alpharius (talk) 09:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

MGTOW

Thanks for adding those sources. ! ShabiDOO 19:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Clearing up a tiny misconception

Hi CBF! Happy new year I just wanted to say that I've read what you've been writing in the moderator elections, regarding Fuzzy endorsing/anti-endorsing multiple candidates... I just wanted to point out that there's actually nothing wrong with him doing so; it's even been common practice at RW for years now (see previous elections), and the hope from staff running the election is that everyone would do as Fuzzy does and give out atleast one endorsement or anti/endorsement to each candidate. This is because the only function of endorsements and anti-endorsements is to help other voters know how to prioritize their votes. Every running candidate will appear in the election regardless (so endorsements and anti-endorsements cannot hurt their chances of ending up on the ballot); the question for the voter then becomes "In which order of preference do I rate them?". That's when the existence of as many endorsements and anti-endorsements as possible per candidate becomes truly helpful. Just as an FYI and all that. So whatever you do, don't fault Fuzzy on that. Instead, join in on the tradition — as I'm about to do too — and give each respective candidate consideration on his/her own; do you want to endorse or anti-endorse that particular candidate? And then move on to the next, and so on. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

FWIW: The reason I obsessively endorse/anti-endorse is to pressure others to endorse/anti-endorse. It's a sane tradition that helps weed out the crazies, though it probably favors popular and uncontroversial users rather than the absolutely best moderators. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 14:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm always a sucker for a well-constructed, rational argument that proves me wrong. I'll admit I wasn't personally in a good mood so thank you for the wonderful crafted argument (not a passive aggressive statement). Was I salty for getting an anti-endorsement, probably.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 17:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

You're a big man, dude. I do mean that. All my respect. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 17:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Because negative campaigning worked so well for HRC. You guys are just awful. Just because you edit a lot does not make you remotely competent or likeable. Taba (talk) 15:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

I think your anti-negative-campaigning message is tempered by the fact that it itself is a negative message. FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 15:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

GOT'EM!! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Oh, yeah, got me! Omfg, what is wrong with the pair of you? Taba (talk) 17:15, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

I believe you are begging the premise. B)—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 17:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

You stole my sig!!111!!1! Not cool, damburgah-face. B) talk 18:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Hey, how did I not see this earlier?-⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

About Hitler

Could you fix that page? That nasty IP snuck in one last edit before you protected the page. While you're at it, ban the IP to prevent further damage. Thanks! PB (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC) Ah, I see you have already done so. Just a second too late! PBFЯЗЭSPДCЗ (talk) 05:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for caring.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 05:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Edit

Sorry about the confusion, some of the writing was long-winded so I shortened the wording to make it more concise and readable, but I didn't actually remove any of the claims backed by sources, so all of the same information was still there; a few sources didn't match the claims in the article so I did correct these, but my intent wasn't page-blanking with fake edit summaries, if that's what you thought, sorry.--BrittanyPBone (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcoming a new account

Hi there! I noticed you welcomed a new account. We normally don't welcome a new account until they've made an edit.:)-⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 04:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Okay.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 20:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Nice try trying to get me to log out

-⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 19:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

It fooled me into logging out...--WMS (talk) 20:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

You probably should at least change it a bit since it nearly fooled me, but people did this back at MarioWiki and it later became against the rules. Some people don't take too kindly to fake templates... --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 20:04, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

a template for it has existed since June 2015 (it also says it's "stolen from Raysenn" meaning it's actually been around even longer). I reckon it's here to stay. Christopher (talk) 20:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

The template is an example of cross-site request forgery (OWASP has a better article). The template is a more innocent (and legal) form of the ones you find in the wild. RW should fix the exploit, but the server has enough problems as it is.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 20:42, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Just because it's there for a year and RationalWiki doesn't disallow it, and other people have used it, and it's a harmless prank (and I don't think it's an exploit lol, it's just toying around with wikicode), some might find it annoying and even unwelcome. Anyhow, just warning you in advance. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 21:12, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Not an exploit? While the template exploit is innocent, there's definitely more malicious actions that can be done with the method. For example, I could have made the URL make the clicker ban a member on the wiki. The ability for a clicked URL to make any logged-in user perform an undesired action is an exploit. A more extreme example is linking to a Netflix URL that makes Netflix users buy a movie they don't want.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 21:25, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Maybe it is in the strictest technical sense, but I think "exploit" just isn't the right word to use (it implies vulnerability, which it isn't exactly, IMO), as how changing your username to my username via displayname isn't really an exploit. It's simply piping a link to a Special page (SPECIAL:USERLOGOUT), a page that's an action. The others are more malicious, but it's still a prank. That's all there is to it. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 21:34, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

When people think of security, many people think of finding zero-days and bugs to exploits. In reality, the most common breaches of security is Social engineering, exploiting human trust and manipulating people. According to the other wiki, a vulnerability is exploiting a bug or flaw. The ability to have a non-session specific URL/redirect perform an action for all users is a design flaw and downright bad design.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 21:58, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Single point checklist for when humor templates confuse you

Are the children overstimulated?

Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

how do I "good post?" Gaul Dernitt (talk) 06:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Did you steal my golden signature color?

-⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 22:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Sure did.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 03:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

What's the idea behind 127.0.0.1?-⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 05:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Got lazy and used your template as a base.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 06:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Do you guys have to use the exact same yellow for your signatures? It makes it slightly hard to differentiate the two of you in my head ;C Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

You also use the exact same faux talk message gag... Guys c'mon Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

MU~HA~HA~HA~HA~~~~~~~!—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 06:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

...is that a slightly darker gold I see? xD Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

You a big fan of wearing cowboy hats indoors?

Well, in any case, come on by! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Block War?

What's that about? Oh, and that message template was actually clever. I was pretty surprised to be logged out. RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

RationalWiki:Blocking_policy#Joke_blocks—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 05:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Ah. I see. Well, have a good night(well, it's night here in California, at least), sir! RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

did you write the deep web article?

hey so im lazy and dont know how to use wiki. im honestly surprised i got here bc im literally so confused and an idiot and also was overwhelmed by the manual thing that pops up when youre a new user. ok but did you write that article? i was reading it and all those little jokes and stuff in there made me laugh really fucking hard bc theyre so sarcastic and if you did write it i wanted to say thanks bc i was having a shit day. imma go read some of those articles linked on your user page now. thanks fam Breezeham (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Scanning through the fossil record it seems to have been written mostly by Cheeseburgerface and Deku-shrub. Christopher (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

You "don't know how to use wiki" yet your signed your post? (Going by the fact it doesn't have "--" before it you didn't even simply click on the sign button but knew where the tilde button was on your keyboard and that that was how you sign posts). Christopher (talk) 20:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

its called i read the thing at the bottom that says use four tildes to sign it. also thanks for finding that now i know how to do it :) Breezeham (talk) 21:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

also i just reread my comment and im cringing so hard why couldn't i form normal, non-run on sentences ?? yikes it wasnt even late at night too Breezeham (talk) 21:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

I was sort of joking about that. (Allthough users do often make sockpuuppets I didn't think you were one). Christopher (talk) 21:36, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

lol i didnt mean to sound passive aggressive in that comment. wow i need to pull myself together its 6:30 and im like dying. also sockpuuppets doesnt exist?? Breezeham (talk) 22:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

It's fine, I swear we had an article about sockpuppets, a sockpuppet is a second account made by a user who already has one (on most wikis it means accounts created to avoid punishment etc but on rationalwiki it means any account made by someone who already has one to prevent impersonation etc). You said you liked the deep web article, click here to see some of our best articles. Christopher (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits

Good job on the bottled water! I didn't know it would be worked on like this when I first created it. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 02:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

No problem!—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 02:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

The Zeitgeist Guy

By now, it's become apparent to me that the guy/girl who wants to delete the Zeitgeist Movement page is a troll, uninterested in actually deleting the page. So my proposal is that we unprotect the talkpage, and allow him to just troll there until he gets bored. Everything we do pretty much gives him what he wants, IMO. RoninMacbeth (talk) 00:41, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Eh. I don't think this is a big issue to warrant such an action, unless you can show me otherwise.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 05:20, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

--RationalWikiUser124 (talk) 02:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Brittany Pettibone

Can you start an article on her? It's been requested and she's a leading figure of the alt-right. Although it was low-quality, I was planning on dramatically expanding it. RationalWikiUser124 (talk) 02:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

I do think she deserves an article: she's a public figure for the alt-right. I don't think that there's someone with her name who may or may not be her on RW is relevant. Bongolian (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Start articles on your userpage if it's not ready for the mainspace.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 02:32, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

I mean, she's a top request on RationalWiki:To do list. The article is locked for now, but if someone could create a decent stub article I'd be free to edit it. RationalWikiUser124 (talk) 02:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

You can't wait a day? A day should be enough for you to create a better article.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 02:43, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

I could, just don't have the energy currently. I might do it in maybe a week-that being said-I could do a brief stub on my page within a day or so. RationalWikiUser124 (talk) 02:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

You can write a tiny stub. Just don't steal it from Wikipedia.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 02:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Here's looking at you, kid

Thanks for the laugther — the best medicine. After morphine. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 07:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome!Morphine in powder form?—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 04:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Trolling

I have reported you to the FBI for persistent vandalism, if you continue I may have to get the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer services involved. Christopher (talk) 17:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

I banhammered you for 314159 seconds (~3.6 days), and if you mess with me again it WILL be permanent. Hi Chris! -Bigljbigl (talk/stalk) 18:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

127.0.0.1

We don't get many stray BoNs editing. A vandalbrake is designed to allow the slow-paced, thoughtful, helpful editor while slowing down the furious shitposters to the point they can't keep their hard-on. ~ ❤️ 17:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC) ...Huh, I guess the it really does affect accounts other than those made since the 127.0.0.1 glitch. Well, CAPTCHA should still hold him. ~ ❤️ 17:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

It would help greatly if sysops have the ability to view IP addresses of users, to help avoid a situation of just full out lockdown.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 17:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I think anything like that would be broken too right now, even if it existed. ~ ❤️ 17:54, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

It exists as a mediawiki extension—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 17:57, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Really?

Are you that obsessed with your stupid prank that you deleted my message from the talk page to keep it secret? Also, your jokes are as cheesy as you. 🖕 -Bigljbigl (talk/stalk) 20:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Gimme my sysop. -Bigljbigl (talk/stalk) 06:41, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

You can't ignore me forever. -Bigljbigl (talk/stalk) 20:24, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

You also called me "apparently not sane" when you removed my sysop. -Bigljbigl (talk/stalk) 03:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Stop whining, this isn't how to get your sysop back. Christopher (talk) 15:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

I reverted your edit because it changed my the joke message. I couldn't care less what you post on my talk page. Also, the Reddit page was protected because of your edits.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 23:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

1. And you took away my sysop because...

2. What Reddit page? -Bigljbigl (talk/stalk) 11:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Extra cheese

You've been nominated to the RationalMedia Foundation election. Please accept or decline here; if you accept, you may wish to campaign.

 Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Reminder

Never delete talk pages, even if they are in your user talk space. Christopher (talk) 15:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

The talk page was merged with the mainspace article with the discussion moved. So when I move a talk page discussion to another page, I should just keep the original page even though it would be empty?—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 17:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't realise it had been moved. A redirect is fine. Christopher (talk) 17:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

(EC) AFAIK: Moved talkpages (i.e. talkpages which currently exist, though at a new 'adress') should only leave behind redirects (if necessary). Reverend Black Percy (talk) 17:13, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Patrols r srs bzniss

*gets all snappy* What's this?

04:33, 12 August 2017 CheeseburgerFace (talk I contribs I block) marked revision 1857285 of page International Socialist Organization patrolled

Don't patrol edits unless you are completely certain they are conducive to the tone and goals of Rationalwiki. The edit you patrolled there reeks of whitewashing. (That probably wasn't the intent of that particular edit, actually, but it had no excuse given for removing that much text.) If you're not one hundred percent certain, just don't click Patrol; someone else can do it if they have more knowledge of the subject, and in any case taking just a little longer to stop having to deal with CAPTCHA is not the end of the world for a new user. (Viewsource is, however, probably a user we would not want on our wiki, going by what they've given us thus far.) ~ ❤️ 16:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Yeah , I fucked up. My intuition was even saying "don't do it" but I did anyway. Sorry about that, I'll be sure to only patrol topics I know about more in the future.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 19:16, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Don't be too hard on yourself, really. I couldn't help but "chew your face off", so speak, though; it was just too delicious. ~ ❤️ 20:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

*idly gnaws at you a bit* ~ ❤️ 03:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Images

How do I upload images on this site? cheers --Stillviewingsources (talk) 23:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Here's how—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 00:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Blocked

You've been blocked for 9 hours due to terrible headlines on the WIGO page and other shit. I hope you learn your lesson.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 03:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

All the chemtrails are making me hungry, so I ate the user that blocked you. ~ ❤️ 03:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

hi

thanks for trying to help, but the IP edit i need removed is this. the other IPs are not mine and the person using those wanted them to be public.Welliver (talk) 15:37, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Done. If you don't want this to happen again, I think a moderator is the only one who can hide blocks. So if you don't want this to happen again, ask a moderator to block the BoN's account, make it not apply to logged in users, and have the block message invisible. Also, RationalWiki — as an autoconfirmed user — is proxy friendly.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 15:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. The problem is I'm currently editing from someone else's IP. Once I get back home in a few days I will edit from my public IP, no problem (I don't mind doxing myself) but I don't want to reveal an IP that isn't actually mine and the owner of whom probably wants to keep private. On another note, I left a message on the Saloon bar section about issues with John Fuerst showing up on his talk page article.Welliver (talk) 15:55, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Please don't delete talkpage comments

Even tiny dumb ones. The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 21:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

What about blatant trolling, like talking sexually about underaged girls ... which did happen unfortunately.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 02:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Edit request

Hi. Page User:Fox -- could you change it from its current text

{{Retired}} <center>{{#ev:youtube|ngxcWeXdvfU}}</center> <center>{{#ev:youtube|7Yhpv-O8zac}}</center>

to {{Retired}} <center>{{#ev:youtube|ngxcWeXdvfU}}</center> <center>{{#ev:youtube|cem38_KjipU}}</center>

and then indefinitely (or however many years you choose) block my account.

Cheers! Fox (talk) 23:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

The deed has been done.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 23:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

In a nutshell

It's a common practice -- see https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?search=In+a+nutshell&title=Special:Search . I know that at least RBP and I do it. If you think it's bad or lazy, I suggest trying to get a community consensus/policy/whatever about it. (I think the videos are useful and a useful way of introducing readers to new, useful YouTubers.) αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 01:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

It's a bad practice, and just because you like it does not make it a "common" one. If you can use words, do so - David Gerard (talk) 07:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

The questions you posed to 86.14.2.77 / Welliver

• https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:86.14.2.77&diff=1863460
• https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Welliver&diff=1863461

How can he answer your questions when "cannot edit own talk page" is a condition of his block? --5.254.65.170 (talk) 14:44, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

He's Back

The "non-malicious editor" we discussed earlier is back. Care to deal with him? RoninMacbeth (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

They look like less of a troll, and more just an idiot. —вιgℓʝвιgℓ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ/sᴛᴀʟᴋ) 10:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

For your eyes only

Check RationalWiki:Dumpster dive of the week. The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 22:34, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Template:quotebox

Any particular reason you deleted it? It is used in many places; they are all broken now. —Kazitor, ^pending 00:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Accident, sorry.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 04:17, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Do youuuuuuuuuu like uuuuuuuuuuusss?

-⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 01:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Non-serious answer: duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude.

Serious answer: I like RationalWiki, but think it has some issues. I will poke the mob at an attempt at some change, but I’m not going to make myself a martyr. I think articles about people sometimes go into the libel area and the wiki has quality control issues.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 04:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

From my challenging of established community feelings, remember that I have the website's best interest in mind. I pushed for the dumpster dive and improved articles from there and many more to come.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 04:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Remember to patrol edits after you "undo" them

ClickerClock (talk) 08:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC) If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{ping|ClickerClock}} to your message, and signing it.

@ClickerClock Okay.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 00:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Deleting User_talk:184.153.178.196

No need to do so. Unless it's harming an article or person, feel free to leave it alone. Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk) 04:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Noted, thank you.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 01:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Complimentary hug

Thanks for endorsing me! (Twice) -⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 04:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

No problem.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 04:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Alyssa Bryant

It's my own account. I can't remember the password and have no way of recovering it. Even though I knew I could accept the nomination, I thought it'd be cool to have my own account nominated at least. The rest are other people's accounts. Sorry if I caused problems, I really only registered to nominate people in the election, otherwise I just edit as an IP usually. Please reinstate the nominations. Have a Happy New Year! It's Jenn (talk) 01:39, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Your sig is delicious

I want to eat it now. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 05:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

@LeftyGreenMario: Ha! The sig also comes with an order of fries. Also, the only reason why I have the burger gif in my sig is so that people can tell that it's me.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 00:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

But it looks so tasty. And constantly spinning, I like that. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 21:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Spinning burger... yum... Comrade GC (talk) 21:16, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Sorry about not giving you credit for the WIGO idea

I didn't mean to insult you intentionally. I'm really sorry -⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

It's not a big deal, I was never insulted. But thank you for being polite.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 21:47, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

@DiamondDisc1: Also I made the same mistake here.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 00:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Sysop

Mind giving me my user rights back? Comrade GC (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Reverting a talk page comment

Did you mean to do that? —Kazitor, ^pending 22:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Er, no. My fingers slipped. Thanks for catching that. Sorry.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 23:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Moderator election results

See the results here. Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 03:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations! FᴜᴢᴢʏCᴀᴛPᴏᴛᴀᴛᴏ, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 03:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Neat. Thanks!—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 04:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations to the new cabal (there is no cabal). Cheers, Cosmikdebris (talk) 04:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for making me laugh.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 04:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Congrats! You have leveled up from replacement to full blown mod!-⇂ɔsᴉᗡpuoɯɐᴉᗡ (talk) 06:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Ditto. All the best!Ariel31459 (talk) 17:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Congrats HamburgerButt. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓^(T|C) 18:23, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

What is the deal with you and Bigs?

For some reason, you seem to hate each other, or that was the case a while back. (ƨɛɪᴙᴛᴎoɔ) (ʞɹᴀᴛ) ɒnippiɿqƧ @ 17:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

I thought we were past this. I even apologized.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 18:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

I was just going through the trolling section on your talkpage and he seems to have antagonized you or vice versa. That was a while ago, though, so looks like it's changed. (ƨɛɪᴙᴛᴎoɔ) (ʞɹᴀᴛ) ɒnippiɿqƧ @ 18:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

@Spriggina My understanding is that it started in July 2017. CheeseburgerFace changed Bigs' user rights so that they were no longer a sysop after Bigs edited CheeseburgerFace's user page and left this message on their talk page. CowHouse (talk) 03:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Sort of? I removed his rights because I thought bigs was a troll, mostly because of his quirky nature. Now I know better.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 03:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Legal highs page

I can see how what you deleted can be construed as non-missional on the purported legal highs page, but it might have been better to open a discussion on deleting it first since it was such a large amount of text, some of which went back quite a ways in time. Also, when did praying to bacon become moral? That's what that image looks like to me anyway![2] Bongolian (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

@Bongolian: I see your point. The content can be moved to the funspace.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 17:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

OK, that's reasonable. I was actually thinking of doing that myself. Bongolian (talk) 18:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

I Am Glad...

That you liked the thread over at Elvis's. RoninMacbeth (talk) 06:54, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Rollback on Saloon Bar Abortion Discussion

Hey, I am relatively unfamiliar with how parts of this site work. Would you mind explaining why my comment on the Saloon Bar was removed? Did I break the rules somehow? I am genuinely confused. --DeusKek1987 (talk) 05:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Wait! Nevermind, sorry. I rolled back my own changes while fixing a typo. I'm an idiot, please ignore me. --DeusKek1987 (talk) 05:37, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Okay.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 22:02, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

problematic user name

Cannabinoids of communism. Really? AMassiveGay (talk) 21:37, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Seconded. Christopher (talk) 21:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Yeah... I'm dumb.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 01:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

It sounds like a band name lol. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 23:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Awesome Award

🧠Rationalwiki

Awesome Award

for CheeseburgerFace/Archive1

Reason: being awesome

Trans girls are awesome. —ClickerClock (talk) 09:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm feeling really shitty right now.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 19:17, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Have hope! Transfeminine Resources btw I don't recommend getting a Tumblr account, the hellsite is too full of drama but it has lots of useful advice for trans peeps! I have hope that one day that trans people will be free to live as they please. Hope that all trans people will be happy. This is the first step in your journey to happiness! —ClickerClock (talk) 03:21, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I hope we get rights. I hope the next President undoes Trump's bullshit. Thanks for the support and link! :)—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 01:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Topic

Unless you are illiterate, I left an edit summary. And what what is this nonsense of "putting up a goat"? You are not telling me to literally put a goat, are you? 99.203.16.160 (talk) 02:11, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Peak trans

If I'm not mistaken, "peak trans" is a term used by TERFs to mean "the time when the trans just went TOO far and I stopped tolerating them" rather than the point at which a trans person felt most gender-affirmed. (ƨɛɪᴙᴛᴎoɔ) (ʞɹᴀᴛ) ɒnippiɿqƧ @ 23:40, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

The term was redefined to spite TERFs.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 02:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Nevermind, then. [scoots away sheepishly] (ƨɛɪᴙᴛᴎoɔ) (ʞɹᴀᴛ) ɒnippiɿqƧ @ 14:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Hey

So, on RWW, I updated your pronouns in the "Monthly Short Story Competition" article from "He" to "She." I'm not entirely sure if this is something I should have done, so are you OK with it? RoninMacbeth (talk) 16:40, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

I honestly didn't even notice. But yeah, that's cool. Thanks, trans ally!—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 17:04, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

RoninMacbeth (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

"transgendered" x

I'm curious, why would that be offensive? --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 21:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

@LeftyGreenMario: https://www.vox.com/2015/2/18/8055691/transgender-transgendered-tnr —127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 22:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I hope I won't fess up as I did several times. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 22:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

KD1 de-SysOped

Why was Kingdamian1 de-syoped? ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 23:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

I did NOT know that changing visibility was NOT allowed. I am disappointed that I was desysoped but not surprised. Sadly, on the internet, people are NEVER, EVER, EVER on my side. Preferring to block me indefinitely or punish me in another way for a MINOR problem WITHOUT EVER GIVING ME A WARNING, or EXPLAINING... TLDR; sad, not surprised --Kingdamian1 (talk) 00:09, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

@Kingdamian1 Will you please quit the persecution complex drama so we can actually find out what's going on. Sheesh, your making me regret looking into this for you. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 00:12, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

From what I can tell, KD1 hasn't really been doing anything out of the ordinary, either for himself or for a relatively inexperienced user. I recommend re-sopping him while reminding him to be careful about edits he may not wish to be associated with. RoninMacbeth (talk) 00:48, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

All clear... Now can I get my sysop rights back, please? --Kingdamian1 (talk) 00:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

CheeseburgerFace, can you please take KD1 out of sysoprevoke? RoninMacbeth (talk) 00:57, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. All good --Kingdamian1 (talk) 01:03, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

I desyopped because I thought that Kingdamian1 was a sock of that transphobic harasser/troll with a very similar name. Sorry, Kingdamian1. If there's a rule added to elections saying you can't run as mod if you've been sysoprevoked, show the mob this message. Sorry for the inconvenience.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 01:11, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

All good, no worries! --Kingdamian1 (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

RWRW

Call me crazy, but after observing him for the past year, I don't think he's actually a troll in the same sense that MarcusCicero and ElvisIsKing are, or at least he's no more of one than nobs. I think he genuinely believes everything he says and is a serious (if misguided) contributor. RoninMacbeth (talk) 17:01, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

I added a collapse template to their post, and I'm not going to do anything else. I think that's fairly tolerant. Troll or not, the same end is met: disruption.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 17:07, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Otherkin

I'm going to get back to work on my Fairies draft. Do you think it's wise to mention the Otherkin subculture in that article, or would that attract the transphobes? RoninMacbeth (talk) 16:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

@RoninMacbeth" I wouldn't bother. Otherkin identify as all sorts of things and it may attract transphobia.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 13:58, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

About my Rights

My block expired, can I have my rights back? --Kingdamian1 (talk) 02:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Done.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 12:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Election

You've been nominated to the RationalMedia Foundation election. Please accept or decline here; if you accept, you may wish to campaign.

— Dysk (contribs) 00:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Readding Adam Perkins

I'm just wondering why you did, as I was told by MrSheen that it was a Mikemikev troll rather than him. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario!

Didn't see that. I removed it.—127.0.0.1  (talk • stalk) 21:50, 25 August 2018 (UTC)