User talk:Elassint/Archive4

Cuter

Image:Cuter.jpgSusanG 19:03, 4 April 2008 (EDT)

Huh? -- Elassint ^{Hi! ^_^} 19:18, 4 April 2008 (EDT)

Liberapedia

Cat: "Humor" is a red link - can you fix dat? PFoster 21:19, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Oh, I already removed it. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 21:21, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Deal

<font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 01:59, 12 June 2008 (EDT)

You fold during negotiations far too early, you know that 85? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:01, 12 June 2008 (EDT)

You're probably right.

...

...Hey! Wait a second! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^Chaos! 02:02, 12 June 2008 (EDT)

Let's discuss this

Rather than just edit warring. _{↳ ↑ <blink>⇨</blink> ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ←} 00:08, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

No discussion? You surprise me, Elassint. _{↳ ↑ <blink>⇨</blink> ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ←} 00:37, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

Its almost 1 am here. We will wait 'till tomorrow. -- Elassint ^{Hi! ^_^} 00:53, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

It is tomorrow where I am. But I see your point, anyway.

Battle at dawn. _{↳ ↑ <blink>⇨</blink> ↕ <blink>▽</blink> ←} 00:56, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

See you guys yesterday. ħuman 01:41, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

Elassint, on WP I'd just slap you with a big Conflict Of Interest warning. Think about it. Genghis^{Our ignorance is God; what we know is science.} 03:46, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

I don't think we can easily win this one. I tried to point out that RationalWiki is also biased. Human reversed it after 8 minutes. Can we defeat the Cabal? Take care. Don’t get into trouble. Proxima Centauri 05:21, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

PC, yes RW has its biases or rather idiosyncratic POVs. However, that is irrelevant to the Liberapedia article. Just because an edit is reverted doesn't mean that something is being suppressed. Elassint is too close to the subject matter on this issue. Rather like any of us editing our profiles on RationalWikiWiki. Genghis^{Our ignorance is God; what we know is science.} 05:41, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

What is there to "win"? I'd argue for deletion of the LP article, except that they did come up with that awesome mock-logo. Otherwise, they are a waste of our space. PC, you said "RationalWiki strongly favors freethought", which is not exactly pointing out a bias. Not clearly, anyway. I'm verging now on nominating the silly liberapedia article for deletion. It serves no purpose here... See you all in the 'morrow! ħuman 05:43, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

Google rates the Liberapedia article highly. It’s an entry point. Proxima Centauri 07:00, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

Ken? Is that you? Genghis^{Our ignorance is God; what we know is science.} 07:17, 6 July 2008 (EDT)