|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive5
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is an archive page, last updated 31 May 2017. Please do not make edits to this page.
Consistency?[edit]
You criticized me for keeping a list of people I disagree with. I'd you're so opposed to attacking other users, then what the fuck is this?! You really picked a good username my dear sir (or madam is the case may be). PBfreespace (talk) 04:16, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's like how they laugh at how silly Aneris is for thinking there is a "SJW cabal" in control...but then they turn around and preach about a "Mona Cabal" as soon as soon as their ideological interests are disputed. Lord Aeonian (talk) 04:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- Aeonian, this place will make you crazy. I shouldn't have come back today. Some part of me keeps thinking, based on no evidence at all, that some reasonable set of standards is suddenly going to be operative. But users like Typhoon, Hipocrit, Castaigne etc., they are allowed to run the place. Shortly after I got here, a smart, sane person who is now gone -- because he couldn't take it-- told me that the place is unworkable. The fact that I keep coming back after having seen overwhelming evidence that he was right does not speak well of my stability or judgment---Mona- (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- That is not the case. For instance, the zealots have either become distracted or have otherwise exhausted themselves, and I have been cleaning up the regressive left page, including adding solid, well sourced examples. If you haven't noticed, their strategy is to just wear you down, slowly removing sourced content and replacing it with their polemic over a long. Rather than fight tooth and nail, I play a defense in depth. I present my side, let them go crazy over it, and then retreat. They make their changes, perhaps several, then forget about them, and then I return. Like all trolls, they feed on conflict and can't subsist long without it. Deprive them of conflict and you starve them, forcing them to go and find other sources of conflict - which allows you to correct their vandalism and put them back at square one. Lord Aeonian (talk) 05:49, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- Aeonian, this place will make you crazy. I shouldn't have come back today. Some part of me keeps thinking, based on no evidence at all, that some reasonable set of standards is suddenly going to be operative. But users like Typhoon, Hipocrit, Castaigne etc., they are allowed to run the place. Shortly after I got here, a smart, sane person who is now gone -- because he couldn't take it-- told me that the place is unworkable. The fact that I keep coming back after having seen overwhelming evidence that he was right does not speak well of my stability or judgment---Mona- (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Hey, guys? Go away. Y'all aren't talking with me. Hipocrite (talk) 10:50, 25 June 2016 (UTC)