User talk:-Mona-

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is automatically archived by Archivist
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>


Arguing about things[edit]

You can argue about things all you want at RationalWiki:Monarail. Please go there instead of the article talk page. Thanks! Hipocrite (talk) 18:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Friendly advice regarding your mop[edit]

Please be patient. Your plight has shown up in my Watchlist several times now and I don't think those that think you should not have a mop like your style, tone or way of handling this situation. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 14:04, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

I don't care about those who do not "like my style, tone or way of handling this situation." This site is dying, and if I don't get my mop back I will simply chalk it up to another example of the wholly arbitrary and capricious nonsense that has driven me away before, and has been causing a hemorrhage of good editors since I joined here last August, and well before. David Gerard...well, do you know who Ryulong is/was? Not likely -- you've been here, what, a month? So it would appear you lack any context to adequately judge the various personalities involved here. (Let's just say David had long made it impossible to stop one of the most abusive and insufferable individuals here from misbehaving, a person who drove many good editros awau. David did so for reasons of personal allegiance that no one has ever been able to figure out.)
I have a large circle of contacts and friends-- smart and reasonable ones -- whom I had briefly been inviting here in the first weeks after I joined. That totally changed and rather quickly, and now I bad-mouth this site every chance I get, including to some 1600 people who follow me on Twitter. This absurdity about my mop is just another reason why that will continue. It's annoying, but at the end of the day I don't care enough to "play all diplomatic and nicer=" to get it back. Either someone will re-mop me because it's the right thing to do, or not.
This is a very small and getting-smaller pond that really does deserve to simply evaporate. Ask some absent people like TheRoadtoWiganPier, AgingHippie, Paravant and any number of others. Decent, reasonable people do not stay.---Mona- (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps you should try talking to other moderators, Mona. Granted, not all of them are active. But you will miss all the shots you don't take. Good luck! Nerd (talk) 15:29, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Never mind. Pbfreespace3 gave you your sysop tools back. Nerd (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
David put sysoprevoke on Mona, for taking away Typhoon's mop, meaning putting her in the sysop group does nothing. --Ymir (talk) 19:59, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Good. Please leave, and never come back. For reals this time. (Of course you probably will come back again after a week or two, because of your pathological need for attention.) --Ymir (talk) 19:59, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Ymir is stupid. I hope Ymir leaves this wiki for good and never comes back. PBfreespace3 (talk) 20:17, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Mona should have her mop back. I say this as someone who disagrees with her actions in areas such as the I-P issue. If people like Typhoon can have their mops, why not Mona? Be consistent. Lord Aeonian (talk) 20:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

RationalWiki sux!!1![edit]

https://mobile.twitter.com/MonaHol/status/746751215124439040

Alerting my friends again to ignore my brief enthusiasm 4 @RationalWiki. Site is a dysfunctional clown show.I apologize 4 advising otherwise The hell I went thru to get the I-P articles decent wasn't worth it. Abuse by Zionists was vile, tolerated & protected @RationalWiki

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:-Mona-&diff=prev&oldid=1690876

I don't care about those who do not "like my style, tone or way of handling this situation." This site is dying, and if I don't get my mop back I will simply chalk it up to another example of the wholly arbitrary and capricious nonsense that has driven me away before, and has been causing a hemorrhage of good editors since I joined here last August, and well before. David Gerard...well, do you know who Ryulong is/was? Not likely -- you've been here, what, a month? So it would appear you lack any context to adequately judge the various personalities involved here. (Let's just say David had long made it impossible to stop one of the most abusive and insufferable individuals here from misbehaving, a person who drove many good editros awau. David did so for reasons of personal allegiance that no one has ever been able to figure out.)

I have a large circle of contacts and friends-- smart and reasonable ones -- whom I had briefly been inviting here in the first weeks after I joined. That totally changed and rather quickly, and now I bad-mouth this site every chance I get, including to some 1600 people who follow me on Twitter. This absurdity about my mop is just another reason why that will continue. It's annoying, but at the end of the day I don't care enough to "play all diplomatic and nicer=" to get it back. Either someone will re-mop me because it's the right thing to do, or not.

This is a very small and getting-smaller pond that really does deserve to simply evaporate. Ask some absent people like TheRoadtoWiganPier, AgingHippie, Paravant and any number of others. Decent, reasonable people do not stay.---Mona- (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Mona, most people don't react this way to negative tidings. FuzzyCatPotato of the Biased Vector fields (talk/stalk) 18:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Most people don't accuse pretty much everyone that disagrees with them of being a Zionist.--JorisEnter (talk) 18:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Being a self absorbed narcissist, Mona is incapable of realizing that those people left BECAUSE of the Monadrama. StickySock (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Aside from the free (and obvious) point made in underscoring that Ruylong indeed is a pig of a person... Well, there just isn't that much that can be said in the defense of those banal quotes. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
...weren't AgingHippie and Paravant usually critical of Mona's part in all the drama? And Mona repeatedly called them the scum of the earth? Somehow now she's claiming them as proof that she was right? WTF.KrytenKoro (talk) 14:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Whom except her minions PBfreespace and ChrissAmiss didn't she call "Zionist", "vile" or whatever insult she was able to think of?--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 17:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 17:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Aenonian. But then, ideologues of whatever stripe tend to stick together. --Castaigne2 (talk) 17:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Question for FCP: why do you care what Mona wrote on her personal Twitter? Do you intend to take some of her criticism seriously, or are you just shit-stirring? Yellow (talk) 20:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey FuzzyCatPotato! Should I find your Twitter and post on your talk page about how silly you are? PB3 (talk) 21:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

If he was talking asinine shit about the wiki, then sure. Really odd that you're trying to defend Mona here, though, her post was a pack of lies from top to bottom.99.112.111.41 (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
My point was it was a sort of character defamation. I wouldn't like it if someone posted on my talkpage something I had said on a social media network critical of the site. Why? What's the point, IP? PB (talk) 20:41, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
No, it is not character defamation in the least. Actual quotes are not defamation. Please don't even try to go down that route; I'll have to mock you for trying to use GG libelslander tactics. --Castaigne2 (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
I gotta agree with Castaigne and FCP here. It's not irrelevant, nor in any way malignant, to ask people follow-up questions about the conclusions and implications of actual verified quotes of theirs. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
"David did so for reasons of personal allegiance that no one has ever been able to figure out." — Mona. :D That was cute, otherwise, correct. ~ Aneris 00:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Please note:[edit]

The last thing anyone wants for a user to return to do is participate in drama. Coops are pure drama and zero good editing. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 15:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Never mind blanking out half the coop in doing so. I hope the kindest explanation avaliable is sufficient as to why that genius move even took place. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 15:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
I don't know what any of the above even means. After being asked to return and edit, I went to the coop and saw all the reasons I won't be doing that. And said so. But I didn't blank anything out, and have no idea what Rev is on about. Yet more indication of why I'm very happy to be done trying to do anything constructive here.
This truly is a ship of fools who are utterly blind to the ethos and actions that will always preclude sensible and smart people from hanging around. Just in the 6-8 months I was here I saw a stampede of good people out of the place. Y'all are reaping what you sow. Bye.---Mona- (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
I beg to differ, there are still many, many great, smart, kind and funny editors on this wiki.--WMS (talk) 15:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
There may still be, but I personally witnessed an exodus of many more. And that was in less than a year here. I go on at some length as to the reason for this in my user page. One after another left in disgust, some who had participated for years. ---Mona- (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Well, is it not the futile Imperial Inquisition?[edit]

You and the inquisition have tried but failed to put out the flames of conflict. Your attempts at purging heresy from this wiki has failed, woman. Khorne shall prevail, the Israel-Arab Conflict shall spill blood for eternity to fill the stomach of the Blood God. He cares not from whence the blood flows, only that it flows (though we prefer strong soldiers first and non-combatants last, but since the conflict has gone on for years, our rage cares not for the casualties though Netanyahu is still a coward for sorcery). Give in to Chaos, for we shall be supreme. Maim!Kill!Burn! 03:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Failure to meet quota[edit]

IndependentToughtAlarm.jpg

The children are being overstimulated

Exposing our editorial staff to unsolicited fact is considered
a form of abuse.


Thank you for not discussing the outside world.

Reverend Black Percy (talk) 18:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)