User talk:Hipocrite/Archive4
Argue with me some more hipocrite, where'd you go?[edit]
What happened?Tex an (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I saw that[edit]
http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Weaseloid&curid=69484&diff=1223980&oldid=1223979
It's good that you reverted it, but clearly you treat rape as a joke and belittle the people who take it seriously.
–Александр(а) (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 19:35, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- RAPE RAPITY RAPE RAPE RAPE. Hipocrite 20:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- There's a difference between "making a joke about rape" and "making a joke about people who bring rape up all the time." You, ehrenstein, have come to be seen as "the person who brings up rape all the time." This might just possibly be because you continually brought rape up all the time. You have also made several enemies here, but no allies, possibly because you kep accusing people who disagrees with you of libel, bigotry, ableism etc. Your continual arguing and lawyering makes you an irritating and unsympathetic character. You're in a hole and you don't know when, or even whether, to stop digging. SophieWilder
21:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Fair enough. –Александр(а) (Talk | Contribs | Ragebox) 21:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- There's a difference between "making a joke about rape" and "making a joke about people who bring rape up all the time." You, ehrenstein, have come to be seen as "the person who brings up rape all the time." This might just possibly be because you continually brought rape up all the time. You have also made several enemies here, but no allies, possibly because you kep accusing people who disagrees with you of libel, bigotry, ableism etc. Your continual arguing and lawyering makes you an irritating and unsympathetic character. You're in a hole and you don't know when, or even whether, to stop digging. SophieWilder
Google Books[edit]
Go search for either of their books, do a search for that statistic. Not fucking rocket science. –Aleksandr Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 16:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- No. I don't waste my time checking the facts of documented fabricators. You do it. Hipocrite 16:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- http://lmgtfy.com/?q=1.4+million+women+raped –Aleksandr Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 16:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Does not support your assertion that "Beevor and Kershaw both support 1.4 million Nazi women." Contradicts it, in fact. "Antony Beevor describes it as the "greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history", and has concluded that at least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia alone." Could you please list your other fabrications? Hipocrite 16:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- First, what page is saying that? There are a lot of sensationalist webpages out there, usually crap newspapers that are trying to sound impressive. I also wouldn't dispute that it's one of the largest events in mass rape, though I would argue that mass rape by the Nazis was far higher, although it might not have been one single event. –Aleksandr Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 16:37, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
- Does not support your assertion that "Beevor and Kershaw both support 1.4 million Nazi women." Contradicts it, in fact. "Antony Beevor describes it as the "greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history", and has concluded that at least 1.4 million women were raped in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia alone." Could you please list your other fabrications? Hipocrite 16:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Sometimes the best way to argue with somebody[edit]
Is to use their citation against them. Zero (talk) 14:34, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
s00per powerz[edit]
Go forth and sin no more - David Gerard (talk) 17:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
I can't believe it.[edit]
Some bunch of people are reinserting garbage "sources" (including one instance of Aeonian quoting himself on Reddit) back to the article! It's incredible. I should start spewing stuff on reddit and facebook, and then insert it as source, too. Typhoon (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Don't insert talk page material into the article text[edit]
It's improper to edit in text like this at the Regressive Left page:
If you thought the above paragraph was really just a load of arglebargle, you got it right.<ref>Hey, I could put a post on reddit here but let's just assume I posted it, right?</ref>
Multiple editors worked on that section. If you have problems with it please take it to the talk page.---Mona- (talk) 21:11, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- That's hot bullshit, Mona. "Multiple editors," did fuck all on that section, you lying sack of shit. Hipocrite (talk) 21:12, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
NH#QWRETBR#EWT#WQBTWARTBWDBTGBTEw[edit]
TAWEHBTWATNWAEBTEWZVTSCSEYT^%WByvheybavgreyaaewyeaydtyrerahgbrhbghbgbzaRH
░░░░░▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░
░░░░░█░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▀▀▄░░░░
░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░▒▒▒░░█░░░
░░░█░░░░░░▄██▀▄▄░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░█░░
░▄▀▒▄▄▄▒░█▀▀▀▀▄▄█░░░██▄▄█░░░░█░
█░▒█▒▄░▀▄▄▄▀░░░░░░░░█░░░▒▒▒▒▒░█
█░▒█░█▀▄▄░░░░░█▀░░░░▀▄░░▄▀▀▀▄▒█
░█░▀▄░█▄░█▀▄▄░▀░▀▀░▄▄▀░░░░█░░█░
░░█░░░▀▄▀█▄▄░█▀▀▀▄▄▄▄▀▀█▀██░█░░
░░░█░░░░██░░▀█▄▄▄█▄▄█▄████░█░░░
░░░░█░░░░▀▀▄░█░░░█░█▀██████░█░░
░░░░░▀▄░░░░░▀▀▄▄▄█▄█▄█▄█▄▀░░█░░
░░░░░░░▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▄▄░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░█░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░█░░
Dude, it's my userspace, so I can do whatever I want with it. This is yours, so feel free to delete the garble of trolltext I just added above. PBfreespace (talk) 21:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Damn it! It won't show up right. Just look in the code, that'll work. PBfreespace (talk) 21:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Your inability to use preview is as expected as it is embarrassing. Hipocrite (talk) 22:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
"not a democrat" Ahh, clever dodge. You aren't registered because you aren't a fan, but you do prefer them, though. Your multiple edits in favor of Hillary Clinton seems to contradict what you implied. PBfreespace (talk) 22:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- That's like saying I'm a Democrat because I prefer savaging both. --Castaigne2 (talk) 22:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Also, I'm the opposite of a Neo-Puritan. Nor am I engaged in the thousand-year war against the Reds. --Castaigne2 (talk) 22:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- And I fixed the piss-poor editing. --Castaigne2 (talk) 22:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- I imply nothing. I am a registered Republican who typically votes a split ticket. I certainly will be voting for whomever the Democrats choose to nominate in this cycle for my entire national ballot. Hipocrite (talk) 22:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
OMG, that enemies list![edit]
Funny thing, I don't remember ever saying that #ImWithHer, yet I'm labeled as a Hillary supporter. Apparently, the fact that I wasn't in coma during the 90s and thus I can recognize a fake-ass "Clinton scandal" from genuine criticism means I'm a dirty Hillary supporter. And of course only a paid shill would say anything critical about Sanders. Typhoon (talk) 11:02, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
So... what did you THINK would happen?[edit]
With the whole, try and stop a user you radically disagree with by reverting repeatedly? ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 18:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)