There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Krom/Archive1
Black supremacism[edit]
You might consider making a category, maybe linking a few from racialism (as most racialism is "light skin superior!"). Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 21:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Sysop[edit]
Because of your edits to and time on the wiki, wizard Sysop has been added to your user rights. Feel free to let your newfound POWER course through your veins. Once the high wears off, see RationalWiki:Sysop guide for more information. If you have questions, bleat ask away. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 21:14, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, I'll read the guide. I also agree with your suggestion above. I'll be working on some new articles/entries. Krom (talk) 17:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC) 21:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Clyde Winters[edit]
His misquotes Eugene O'Growney a catholic priest. Nowhere in these 9pages does he say the Celts were black. He mentions dark and light haired peoples and a "mixed" race. The word "black people" does not appear anywhere in the text. Nowhere in the text is black skin discussed. He uses the word "dark" once in reference to skin tone which he compares to modern berbers. Winters has jumped the gun and obviously equated O'Growney's nonsense with black people.
Online [1] Are the Irish Celts?. pp. 350-359 Mr Burton (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)