Information icon.svg At All things in moderation, we are currently voting on restrictions on the use of LLMs (chatbots) in RationalWiki. Reminder: you need to have at least 75 edits and to have been registered for at least three months to be eligible to vote.

User talk:LogicMaster 777

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Are you going to establish an aircraft manufacturing company, name it after yourself, and produce a family of long-range wide-body twin-engine jet airliners called the LogicMaster 777? Landmartian (talk) 18:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Potential Donors should know RationalWiki's true agenda[edit]

RationalWiki should make its true policies clear as regards to censorship and vandalism, which run counter to its publicly stated policies; otherwise it is taking these donations under false pretenses, which is fraud.LogicMaster777 (talk) 05:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Lets call the police. I reckon they can sort this out once and for all. Acei9 06:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
To anyone who reads this and doesn't already know: The heading creator is a fellow who argues endlessly about a related set of topics--the existence and purpose of the state and people's view of it--and doesn't like that people on RationalWiki have responded to his claims and ideas with things other that "Why, yes, you're totally right!" They keep disputing his points and telling him he's wrong for some reason--possibly something to do with their objection to his assertion that they all worship the idea of the state, or his idea that constitutions are scriptures and police badges are magic jewels. (I can't speak for others, but I happily confess myself to not worship the state or government or anything much at all. I am quite certain there are organizations which govern large areas of land; I, in fact, work in a building owned and administered by one of these organizations and even draw my paycheck from said organization, even if I am technically a janitorial contractor.)
You may investigate the truth of this yourself by checking his user contributions or the (many) pages created by him, where he has been allowed free reign to express his ideas (which he feels constitutes censorship), with opposing comments and edits contained on the talk pages (which he calls 'vandalism'). I wholeheartedly encourage you to form your own conclusions about him and, if the urge comes upon you, participate in any debates or talk pages he may have spawned but please do me (and others) the courtesy of understanding we've long since reached a what we feel is a valid conclusion about him. We'll be happy to discuss it with you, if you feel inclined. --Maxus (talk) 07:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
A lot of censorship is present on RationalWiki (talk) 07:19, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
That's not censorship, that's an edit disagreement. --Castaigne (talk) 14:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
And they protect the page so I can't express my views without any justifiable reason. I'm also speaking for the deleted pages in that picture. In addition to that, RationalWiki tried to censor this topic from this page. There is some obvious suppression of free speech here.-- (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Potential donors should be Potential donors should be also aware that RationalWiki is edited by the CIA. Signed, the CIA (talk) 07:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Hey, Bonny, I notice your cap didn't include the bit where you were invited to take it up on the user page. --Maxus (talk) 07:49, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was moved to some isolated location without any valid reason and I'm not allowed to move it back or specify where it was moved, which is in direct conflict with the community standards-- (talk) 00:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

No, it's not and the reasons have now been explained quite clearly to you on your talk page. ScepticWombat (talk) 07:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)