User talk:CIA

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, CIA!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Acei9 19:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Don't blank articles[edit]

This is probably pointless, but now you've been asked. Please don't vandalize the site. Ochotona princepsnot a pokémon 20:54, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Excuse me?--CIA (talk) 21:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Like this. If that was an accident, well, not a problem. Ochotona princepsnot a pokémon 21:04, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
It was obviously an accident. I don't know what happened.--CIA (talk) 21:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Then I expect it won't be any problem for anyone in the future. Accidents do happen, and that's fine. Your choice of userpage text combined with a massive blanking made me suspicious that you were here for less than good reasons, so I thought I'd ask politely instead of just automatically assuming bad faith. You also seem harmless enough, so I'm going to autopatrol you so you don't have to deal with the captchas. We may need to turn that back off if we need you to help troubleshoot the captcha issue you just reported on the Tech support page, but it'd only be temporary. Ochotona princepsnot a pokémon 21:26, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Unsigned template[edit]

Good "unsigs"!--Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 11:56, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Godlike Edit Warring[edit]

Dude, out of curiosity, what are you doing? Noir LeSable (talk) 19:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

*drops character* The anonymous editor's actual problem with the Tavistock sentence seems to be the mention that there are conspiracy theories associated with it, not how Trinity feels about it. After I removed the banning part to test this, the rest of the text didn't flow well, so I did a slight rewrite, putting it in a more appropriate place and adding some links. I think that snippet fits better in that place anyway. *back into character* I would tell you, but then I'd have to kill you. Burn this message after reading.--the CIA (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC)