| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
User talk:Voxhumana/WomSci
From RationalWiki
If we're considering computer science add in Ada Lovelace
and Grace Hopper
. Also, what was the name of that tooth lady? TheShade (talk) 01:21, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
By all means add them to the main list. VOXHUMANA 02:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Done. TheShade (talk) 02:24, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Are philosophers of science allowed? Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 02:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- As noted, I used the term "science" in the broadest possible way, although obviously I'll draw the line at purported "woo scientists". It's a working page, not a mainspace article, so pretty much anything goes. VOXHUMANA 02:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- All right. That should keep you busy for a while. Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 03:15, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- As noted, I used the term "science" in the broadest possible way, although obviously I'll draw the line at purported "woo scientists". It's a working page, not a mainspace article, so pretty much anything goes. VOXHUMANA 02:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Are philosophers of science allowed? Nebuchadnezzar (talk) 02:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)