Fun:Vote for Ban

This page is for fun and humour

Here, you can nominate a user of your choice (Yes! Yourself included!) to be banned for a period of time of up to 5 minutes, depending on the... severity of their offense. Common reasons can include being too helpful, welcoming too many users, making too many positive contributions, and the like. The "winners" even receive this template!

The Mob has spoken, and their demands were met. This user has been PWNED by Democracy

Rules:

1. If someone already has been "Pwned" don't nominate them again. Ever. They already won.
2. This is not the place to report vandals or people who should be banned. The only people you should nominate are those you wish would be banned.
3. Please remember to update the score after you vote.
4. THIS IS A JOKE PAGE.
5. Follow this format

Insert name of User to Ban

Score. +1

1. Nom and For - Way too helpful, seems to be everwhere at once. BAN! User:Example
2. Kerban - Yup, as per above User:JoeSmith
3. Against - He is not good enough to deserve a ban. User:SomeGuy

When enough votes have been obtained (10 or more), a sysop is free to close the voting.

Nominate the users below this line.

Noms

User:Javascap

Score, +1

1. Nom and For For taking the time out of his life to make this page. BAN! Javascap 21:26, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
2. Kerban! For making me waste my precious time casting this vote for him. DickTurpis 22:13, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
3. Against To spite him in his attempt to be banned, and to make DickTurpis's vote mean nothing, thus completely wasting his time. Thunderkatz^Ho! 22:22, 10 July 2008 (EDT)

   Confound You!!!! DickTurpis 22:24, 10 July 2008 (EDT)

Linus

Score: +4

1. Nom and For, per my deeply held desire to be (temp)banned. --λινυσ^(☮) 22:30, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
2. Wish granted. DickTurpis 22:31, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
3. Yup Ban 'im Javascap 22:51, 10 July 2008 (EDT)
4. Aye - A self-professed geek who can't even wikilink his own user-name deserves to get banned. Genghis^{You have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.} 08:18, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Ban Ki-Moon

1. Vote for Ban!!!!!!! DickTurpis 23:11, 10 July 2008 (EDT)

Struck down. Sorry, but Sysops on RationalWiki can't ban "some guy" from another wiki. :-( JAVASCAP Talk to ME BAN SOMEONE!

I wasn't aware the UN was a "wiki". DickTurpis 08:19, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Well, if it happens that Ban Ki-Moon signs up for RationalWiki with that name, than we can ban him. As of now, he is alrady banned because... he hasn't signed up yet! =D JAVASCAP Talk to ME BAN SOMEONE!

Ban

1. I nominate myself for obvious reasons.--Ban^{Vote for me} 10:59, 11 July 2008 (EDT)
2. You are asking for it. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 14:58, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Block

1. No! Vote for Block! Don't vote for Ban! Block 15:19, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Stile4aly

1. Ban me because I'm useless and I hate you all. Stile4aly 16:40, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Human

Tiresome anti-Dane, angry drunk, everyone hates him. Bohdan2 00:22, 25 July 2008 (EDT)

127.0.0.1

For obvious reasons 85.228.96.55 13:18, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

BenjaminS

For unproductive activity. JJ4E^{Veritas vincere tenebras} 22:07, 19 November 2008 (EST)