Forum:Favorite pages at CP

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please indicate (and update as time goes by) & sign your favourite examples of lunatic drivel on Conservapedia;

  • Kiwi - the fact that they're flightless didn't stop them walking from the ark to New Zealand. (Extra lulz for using AIG as a source for that gem.)--PsyGremlinWhut? 03:31, 14 January 2009 (EST)
I've screengrabbed both pages. Toast s.png (with butter!) talk to Toast 06:35, 16 January 2009 (EST)
I think it was me that WIGOed that a couple of months ago. Unfortunately it didn't get highly rated. But yes, it's like a prehistoric ruin from the Age of Contests. Redchuck.gif ГенгисIs the Pope a Catholic? 13:10, 18 January 2009 (EST)
Ah, those were the good old days... PS, it still illustrates the poorly written snartikle in question! ħumanUser talk:Human 00:05, 24 January 2009 (EST)
  • All of the "terms" pages which do nothing. Honestly, Andy seemed to encourage his homskollars to compile those things and then gave them sysop privileges on the basis of their edit count, but they could have just categorised the pages and the category page itself would have sorted them. Related to these terms pages I do like 900 BC. Redchuck.gif ГенгисIs the Pope a Catholic? 13:19, 18 January 2009 (EST)
  • Oh, that reminds me: CP's article on clothing, covering the full history of costume all the way from 900 AD to 1100 AD. (Am I adding too many of these?) WéáśéĺóíďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 13:28, 18 January 2009 (EST)
"(Am I adding too many of these?)" Maybe? Yes, I think so. ħumanUser talk:Human 00:11, 24 January 2009 (EST)
  • Theater. Not the craziest, but the one that shows them up the best for the latter-day Puritans that they are. Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX 13:39, 18 January 2009 (EST)
If I'm not much mistaken you can see her nipples!! Is this right on a godfearing, conservative webshite? (also: "Motion pictures were a United States invention"!) Toast s.png (Crumpets) and butter 15:31, 18 January 2009 (EST)
  • "Two meters" will always hold a special place in my heart, but if deleted pages don't count then Liberal intellectualism comes close, it contains a little bit of many of Andy's favourite topics such as Dawkins' professorship or existence of black holes, ignoring others' achievements and smearing them with reasons such as "poor student" and "insisted that there must be life in outer space" and just overall poop-flinging. NightFlare 20:50, 23 January 2009 (EST)
  • The last sentence "On Feb. 18, 2008, a Conservapedia editor found flagrant bias in a Wikipedia entry concerning a textbook dispute over the theory of evolution. He corrected the bias, and predictably a Wikipedian reinserted the biased, incorrect material on Wikipedia within only eight hours" Shows another thing: two mentions of Wikipedia (at least one but probably both of which are superfluous) are wikilinked to cp:wikipedia; not to mention the linking of "Conservapedia" itself. Talk about overdoing it! Love² 10:53, 27 January 2009 (EST)
  • Oh, the evilness of WP can never be overstated. Just as the word "liberal" must be linked whenever Andy types it. KlapauciusEsteemed Constructor 11:02, 27 January 2009 (EST)
  • Here's the 15 - 17 ref. Love² 11:05, 27 January 2009 (EST)(it was taken out twice & re-inserted each time by Kajagoogoo) Love²