Conservapedia talk:Recall attempt on Robert Menendez/NSCJ Transcript
Sorry to overwrite your start, Antifly and Human, but I had it all typed out and ready to paste in here, and I didn't want to redo my lousy format.--Martin Arrowsmith (talk) 05:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- OH fuck, I've just wasted all that time transcribing 4-6mins? Shit - please put your name in the log when this is happening so people don't waste their time. However, pissed off as I (and others) might be for the time waste, thanks a million for doing it all Martin. DogPMarmite Patrol 05:11, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- We really need to break this up into sections. By time stamp roughly correlating to Schlafly's comments? ħuman 05:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, folks, I didn't see that there was a signup sheet as I was busy doing other stuff. Ahem.--Martin Arrowsmith (talk) 05:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Apologies accepted due to service to king and country. DogPMarmite Patrol 05:23, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Don't go giving me no foreign titles or honors, now, or I might not never get to be President on account of losing my citizenship due to the true and correct but suppressed 13th Amendment.--Martin Arrowsmith (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Show us the Birth Certificate! DogPMarmite Patrol 05:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Don't go giving me no foreign titles or honors, now, or I might not never get to be President on account of losing my citizenship due to the true and correct but suppressed 13th Amendment.--Martin Arrowsmith (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Apologies accepted due to service to king and country. DogPMarmite Patrol 05:23, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, folks, I didn't see that there was a signup sheet as I was busy doing other stuff. Ahem.--Martin Arrowsmith (talk) 05:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- We really need to break this up into sections. By time stamp roughly correlating to Schlafly's comments? ħuman 05:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Conservapedia link offer[edit]
We must try and get Conservapedia to link to this, a fine example of Best of the People! They never will of course, but you can bet they won't have a transcript, and Andy would LOVE to have this..... DogPMarmite Patrol 05:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, yeah, because he totally pwned! ħuman 07:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Laughter[edit]
You forgot to mention where people were laughing at assfly! CrundyTalk nerdy to me 08:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Any transcript of the rebuttal[edit]
I'd love to see the state's attorney completely demolish Schlafly's reasoning. Stile4aly (talk) 07:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Was the state's attorney presence? The video linked on here has Robert Menendez'z lawyer giving his opening statement leaving 5 minutes left for rebuttal, it shows him coming to give his rebuttal where he say's it'll be brief but then ends Nil Einne (talk) 14:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Actual page[edit]
We need to setup an actual page for this where we can talk about the case, do analysis, include video, ect. CP space I assume? What should we call it? tmtoulouse 15:35, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Introduction[edit]
Any chance we could have an introduction to this so that those who are not in the know (like me) could have some idea about why this dialogue is taking place and what they are arguing about?--BobSpring is sprung! 17:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, now I see. I've linked it back to the main article.--BobSpring is sprung! 17:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Not assfly[edit]
cmon, where was the schlafly slip, the schlafly rearguard? I could tell with 99% certainty that the judges were against classroom prayer and were thus communists--BenB (talk) 13:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)