There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Data Quality Act
| You betrayed the|
The Data Quality Act (DQA) is a law that is not really an act, nor does it ensure "data quality." It's actually a two-sentence rider that was slipped into a 2001 appropriations bill by Rep. Jo Ann Emerson (R-MO) and an industry lobbyist to, ostensibly, "provide policy and procedural guidance to Federal agencies for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including statistical information) disseminated by Federal agencies." Because of its vague wording, special interests have latched onto it to challenge the legitimacy of scientific studies on subjects relating to environmental and health risks, including global warming, deforestation, and pesticides.
Notably, it has also been used in an attempt to lift the ban on medical marijuana.
- Data Quality Act, OMB Watch
- Catherine Campbell Meshkin. Unchecked Data: A Tool for Political Corruption? Engage Volume 11, Issue 3, December 2010 
- Thanks to a little-known piece of legislation, scientists at the EPA and other agencies find their work questioned not only by industry, but by their own government, Chris Mooney
- Activist Enlists Unlikely Ally in Bid to Legalize Pot, LA Times