Debate talk:What should PZ do with the crackers?

To make a slightly more serious point here, I'm surprised that most of the debate (at least on this site) has centred around the fact that PZM said that they were "just crackers" and very little has been said about his suggestion that people get hold of a cracker and send it to him so that he can, in his words, "treat it with profound disrespect and heinous cracker abuse". I suppose that it's because this action seems to stem from the "just a cracker" statement. --Bob^{bing up} 14:05, 13 July 2008 (EDT)

Yeah, I've got an opinon on that, too. I don't suppose I even need to post it, though. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 14:14, 13 July 2008 (EDT)

I'm sure I can guess it, AKj. :-) It just seemed surprising to me that so much of the focus went on the initial statement and so little on the later challenge. Come back Lenski! Let's do something else!--Bob^{bing up} 14:17, 13 July 2008 (EDT)

Self defense

I understand the enthusiasm with which our brothers want to defend the Lord's body, but regardless, shouldn't He be able to defend it himself? There have been instances where a disbeliever taunts our Lord in an attempt to prove He doesn't exist, and we all know that He doesn't respond to such juvenile stunts. But if those heathens are holding hostage little bits of His body, isn't that the last straw? Shouldn't He at last respond?

Or, since there's no observable difference between a transubstantiated cracker and an untransubstantiated one... maybe He already has? --Toiretni 17:15, 13 July 2008 (EDT)

Archive

Move to fun space or to RW space. This ship has sailed. Тy^Talk. 16:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Debate or forum space, perhaps. ^narchist 01:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Debate space looks like just the place for this. Will move in a sec. The Goonie Punk ^{Can't sleep, clowns will eat me!} 01:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)