Fun talk:Blues
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Interesting, but it should either be in the conservapedia namespace (as a copy of an article they deleted) or ACD, where we keep our fun stuff. Also, it needs to be seriously de-redlinked. Since we aren't a 'cyclopedia, we'll never have all those articles... Comments, please? humanbe in 15:06, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
- Er, I already got reamed about it, and the article was moved to Music:Blues, but for some reason this one is still here? JazzMan 15:34, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
- Hopefully the reaming wasn't too bad? We all make namespace mistakes. So after I fixed a lot of redlinks in this one... Music: is not a real namespace, and these should be in "ACD", our amusement space. Anyway, you've seen the talk over at SusanG, so you know what's going on. When this was moved to the new name, was the "move" button used, or was it just copy/pasted? The move button changes the old name to a redirect, which usually should then be deleted (janitor/sysop work). humanbe in 15:54, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
copied from other talk page that is gone[edit]
Holy cow that's a lot of red links... guess it won't be hard to find things to do around here! JazzMan 21:09, 8 September 2007 (CDT)
- Oh! Come on. sg 21:13, 8 September 2007 (CDT)
- We could start a RationalWiki:ProjectMusic. Though it seems kinda pointless. ThunderkatzHo! 21:14, 8 September 2007 (CDT)
Don't worry, you're not alone. ;) - All Hail Tuna 02:34, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
- I think blues and jazz are somewhat contrary to rationalism. :p ThunderkatzHo! 08:40, 9 September 2007 (CDT)