There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Fun talk:Liberal/Archive3
FunSpace?[edit]
I don't agree with the idea of pushing this version to FunSpace... I mean, really, the term "liberal" is so devoid of meaning individually without qualifiers that it's almost useless to use the term just on its own. In fact, the term "liberal" is basically a crappy term that perpetuates the false dichotomy of "liberal-conservative" leaving the two terms as meaningless epithets used by everyone. Meaning, if you consider yourself "liberal" you tend to use "conservative" as a epithet for anything and everyone who disagrees with you, and vice-versa for conservatives as well. Thus, having a "serious" article is kind of worthless. --Eira OMTG! The Goat be Praised. 05:02, 3 March 2011 (UTC)