Fun talk:Lulz

Mission

Far too parochial. Should we really have articles devoted purely to ourselves? Pink_{(Astronomy Domine)} 23:27, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

Yes. What is your argument to delete? ħuman 00:47, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

Jesus on an Easter stick, this article literally defines what we do here. And you would have us delete it? ħuman 00:48, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

RationalWiki is not supposed to be about us. Put it on RWW. Pink_{(Astronomy Domine)} 00:56, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

Why isn't it supposed to be about us? Where do you divine that precept from? ħuman 00:58, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

Common sense? The word of Trent M Toulouse? Or shall we have articles on everything else to do with the community? Bags I write the [Chaos is great article. Pink_{(Astronomy Domine)} 01:00, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

I vote we keep it. Chill with the whole "You keep this so I make this" crap already. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 01:05, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

I wasn't actually doing that. Jellyfish are seldom pointy. Pink_{(Astronomy Domine)} 01:05, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

Oh, apart from Chaos is great, which I really wasn't going to create. Damn you Triple X! Pink_{(Astronomy Domine)} 01:07, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

As much as I appreciate all the effort you guys put in this wiki

I really do not like this term being used in this wiki. Brings up way too much connotations to the stupid 4chan/ED shit plaguing the internet. I'd like this wiki to be a bit more respectable than that. Raistuumum (talk) 11:01, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Get over it, at least until you make a user page. Then, you can tell us how to run this dump. ħuman 11:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Done. At the least, why is there a quote of Carlos Mencia there? Considering the quote, he's not exactly someone I would laugh to. --Raistuumum (talk) 07:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Now you can tell how to run this dump! Any idea how to get rid of the seagulls? ħuman 08:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Sometimes we make fun of things and sometimes we use humour. Apart from that, it would be quite difficult to ban - and enforce a ban - on a particular word which one user finds offensive or out of place. Have you read RationalWiki:Newcomers?--Bob^{Spring is sprung!} 08:50, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

After you have read that, and if you really want to take this up, then the correct place would be RationalWiki talk:Community Standards--Bob^{Spring is sprung!} 08:54, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Wrong description......

the "Lulz" is laugh gained from making fun of people like cripple and such (read it straigh from those asshole on ED) this article is horrible and insulting, the lulz must be destroyed and those fucking asshole ( ED/4chan) deserve a good whipping with a bladed lash given by a UFC champion.Waronstupidity (talk) 09:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Apart from your general stupidity, I must respect your mention of the octagonal cage. ħuman 10:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Best description of lulz I've heard

I do believe I saw this on SomethingAwful one time. lulz are lols that are had at someone else's expense. Dr. Swordopolis (talk) 04:19, 30 November 2011 (UTC)