There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| We're all homos here|
|A Gradual Science|
|Plain Monkey Business|
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744—1829) was a nineteenth-century proponent of evolutionary theory. However, unlike Darwin, Larmarck expressed ideas on evolution involving "acquired" characteristics passed on to offspring - rather than genetic characteristics. For example, if you cut the tail off of a mouse then it will give birth to tailless mice. This is an excellent example of really shoddy thinking. A better, classic example, and an indication of how Lamarck might have been "almost right", postulates that the blacksmith's children will "inherit" his strong arms.
Evidence for Lamarckism
Evidence that seemed to support the Lamarckian hypothesis were the experiments of Charles Brown-Séquard, who produced epilepsy in guinea pigs by bisection of the large nerves or spinal cord, which led him to believe that, in rare instances, the artificially-produced epilepsy and mutilation of the nerves was transmitted. Further attempts to duplicate Brown-Séquard's results from his original experiment were unsuccessful.
Lamarck's theories were adopted and promoted (along with Lysenkoism) by the Soviet government, who saw Darwin's theories of evolution based on natural selection and survival of the fittest as linked to dog-eat-dog competition and thereby to capitalism; Lamarck's theories that evolution occurred through acquired traits were attractive because they were a better fit with Marxism and the belief that society would eventually evolve into a stateless communistic utopia, without competition. The USSR's adoption of Lamarckian evolution as official state ideology set biological science back 50 years in that country.
The term neo-Lamarckism refers to a loose grouping of largely heterodox theories and mechanisms that emerged after Lamarck's time which support the inheritance of acquired characteristics (physiological changes acquired over the life of an organism transmitted to offspring). Neo-Lamarckism remained the most popular alternative to natural selection at the end of the 19th century, and would remain the position of some naturalists well into the 20th century.
The Lamarckian hypothesis of inheritance of acquired characteristics (also called the theory of adaptation or soft inheritance) was rejected by August Weismann in the 1880s when he developed a theory of inheritance in which germ plasm (the sex cells, later redefined as DNA), remained separate and distinct from the soma (the rest of the body); thus according to this theory nothing which happens to the soma may be passed on with the germ-plasm. This hard inheritance model excludes the ideas of Lamarckism.
There has been recent interest in Lamarckism and its link with epigenetics. While Darwin's theory of natural selection still holds true, gene function can be altered by certain environmental factors and these changes can be inherited.