There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Advertising Standards Authority
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Advertising Standards Authority | Result: nom withdrawn[edit]
Delete[edit]
#Could possibly be notable but probably not, a stub. Christopher (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- We don't have "notability", we have "missionality", and the ASA turns out to be a fantastically effective tool for skeptics, particularly in the UK - David Gerard (talk) 15:46, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant missionality. But I think that if it just remains a stub there isn't really much point, I would delete it and put it on the to do list. Christopher (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- ... it looks useful and informative to me - David Gerard (talk) 16:33, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant missionality. But I think that if it just remains a stub there isn't really much point, I would delete it and put it on the to do list. Christopher (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Before rallying the mob to delete, try rallying it to expand. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Per Reverend Black Percy. --It's-a me,
LeftyGreenMario! 03:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Per me being an idiot and wanting to nominate every stub I come across for deletion. Christopher (talk) 17:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)