There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Basic science
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Basic science | Result: Deleted, Unanimous vote.[edit]
Delete[edit]
- It's a dictionary definition, and has been for many years ... Unless someone makes this page worthwhile I see no reason in keeping it... Carpetsmoker (talk) 14:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Wẽãšẽĩõĩď
Methinks it is a Weasel 17:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Off with its head! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 17:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Redirecting to science is the only logical solution. That's just basic science! Bicyclewheel
19:33, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- I support making it a redirect to Science. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- How did this survive for so long? O.o 142.124.55.236 (talk) 19:37, 24 September 42015 AQD (UTC)
- There are loads of crappy stubs flying under the radar. Eventually one gets randomarticled by someone who cares enough to do something about it. Bicyclewheel
19:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Check Special:ShortPages if you want to blitz a few microstubs. A lot of what shows up on there are fork pages, though. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď
Methinks it is a Weasel 22:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Check Special:ShortPages if you want to blitz a few microstubs. A lot of what shows up on there are fork pages, though. Wẽãšẽĩõĩď
- There are loads of crappy stubs flying under the radar. Eventually one gets randomarticled by someone who cares enough to do something about it. Bicyclewheel
- Content is just a basic description that has a low chance of improving and should be killed. --Sockpuppet of localhost (talk) 22:36, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Very informative. Now, how many feet make two meters? Spud (talk) 11:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)