RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Basic science

Basic science | Result: Deleted, Unanimous vote.

Basic science (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. It's a dictionary definition, and has been for many years ... Unless someone makes this page worthwhile I see no reason in keeping it... Carpetsmoker (talk) 14:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
2. Wėąṣėḷőįď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 17:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
3. Off with its head! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 17:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
4. Redirecting to science is the only logical solution. That's just basic science! Bicycle^wheel 19:33, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

   I support making it a redirect to Science. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:16, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

5. How did this survive for so long? O.o 142.124.55.236 (talk) 19:37, 24 September 42015 AQD (UTC)

   There are loads of crappy stubs flying under the radar. Eventually one gets randomarticled by someone who cares enough to do something about it. Bicycle^wheel 19:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

   Check Special:ShortPages if you want to blitz a few microstubs. A lot of what shows up on there are fork pages, though. Wëäŝëïöïď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 22:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

6. Content is just a basic description that has a low chance of improving and should be killed. --Sockpuppet of localhost (talk) 22:36, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
7. Very informative. Now, how many feet make two meters? Spud (talk) 11:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)