There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for demotion/Islam
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Islam | Result: leave as is[edit]
Demote to silver[edit]
Status quo[edit]
- Not good enough, imo.
Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 16:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- I want more silver articles, but this is more of a historical sort of thing for supporting other articles. Now, Islamophobia is a good topic for silver/gold, as are articles on Islamist terrorism, conspiracy theories regarding Islam, pseudo-scientific arguments regarding Quranic foreknowledge and whatnot. CorSock (talk) 16:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- It's accurate, I guess, but this doesn't really fulfill RW's mission on "Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism" very well. Maybe a couple of edits could get this to silver, but for now, it's fine the way it is.— Jeh2ow Damn son! 15:48, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
- One of the requirements for slivering an article is that it’s potential gold material. I don’t see us having Islam on the front page unless we demoted one or two other major religions at the same time. Christopher (talk) 09:47, 9 April 2021 (UTC)