RationalWiki talk:The Great Conservapedia Cull

This looks like a crusade against CP space. There is certainly a lot of stuff that could do with tidying up but a blitzkrieg is not the way to go about it. What'll happen is that 3 editors will approve a deletion before a majority have had time to review the situation and there will be recriminations. Генгис^pillaging 23:07, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Lol, so far 4 editors have looked at it and 3 are staunchly pro-CP. Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 23:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

One thing to keep in mind here is that much of this could be considered reference material. It has been gathered (painstakingly in some cases) and put in one convenient location, with many interlinks. If Schlafly or Conservapedia should ever experience a renaissance of sorts, it will be here for people to find. Imagine a mother lode like this existing for, say, a current Presidential candidate... ħuman 00:39, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

You might be right. Interestingly, no pages have been deleted yet -- only merged. So the information survives. 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 01:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)