RationalWiki:The Great Conservapedia Cull

The successor to 2012's hit book-burning session, RationalWiki:Do we keep these CP-related articles?. In case you're wondering: yes, I take great joy in censorship and virulently hate 1,000% of Conservapedia-space. αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Articles which were on the 50/50 vote line and were kept are included here, with several new cull-ees stepping up to the chopping block.

Resolved articles at RationalWiki:The Great Conservapedia Cull/Resolved.

A

Conservapedia:Andy Schlafly, Renaissance Man

Delete

1. Schlafly-cruft. (Best alternative would be merge into "Schlafly debate tactics" article, but then it'd just be concentrated cruft.) The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep

1. If not keep, then merge. But there's no reason to delete this. Typhoon (talk) 09:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
2. Quite hilarious to see what teh Assfly thinks he knows. --JorisEnter (talk) 10:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
3. Not yet. Hclodge (talk) 11:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
4. --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge/Redirect

1. If not keep, merge with Schlafly debate tactics. It's important because it demonstrates Assfly's ability to bullshit. Old guard (talk) 23:59, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Conservapedia:Article matrix/captures

Delete

1. Unnecessary. Herr FuzzyKatzenPotato (talk/stalk) 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep

1. Valuable resource for future CP researchers. Hclodge (talk) 11:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
2. --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Goat

1. I don't know why we have this, quite honestly. Old guard (talk) 00:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

   Maybe to prove that Conservapedia:Article matrix is true? Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 00:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

   So you're saying it's essential for that page? Typhoon (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Conservapedia:Articles related to the Lenski affair

Keep

1. The only reason to delete this is if you have no idea what the Lenski Affair was or its direct relationship to RationalWiki's mission. Old guard (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

   Shit, meant to vote merge. FuzzyCatPotato of the Uptight Tubes (talk/stalk) 00:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

2. This article is highly informative about what a huge fiasco their attack on Lenski was. Typhoon (talk) 09:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
3. The Lenski affair attracted wider internet coverage. Генгис^pillaging 22:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
4. Hclodge (talk) 11:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
5. --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge/Redirect

1. With the main Lenski affair article. The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
2. --Owlman (talk) 06:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
3. This is just a page of links. Some of them can go into "See also" and "External links" on the Lenski affair page. Spud (talk) 10:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

E

Conservapedia:Examples of bias in Conservapedia

Keep

1. If CP can have a very long article on "Examples of Bias in WP" then this article is a well-deserved counterpoint. Hclodge (talk) 11:21, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
2. --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge/Redirect

1. Conservapedia Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
2. Agree, mergeinto Conservapedia proper. Not really stand-alone material. Old guard (talk) 00:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
3. Too short. Typhoon (talk) 09:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
4. This obviously belongs in the CP article itself. --JorisEnter (talk) 10:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
5. Agreed. Doesn't need an article to itself. Some of it must be a bit out of date now too. Spud (talk) 10:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
6. --Owlman (talk) 20:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

J

Conservapedia:JoeyJ

Delete

1. Shitty stub. The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
2. Do we need an article on every CP editor?--JorisEnter (talk) 10:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
3. We most definitely do not need articles on every Conservapedia user. I am reminded of the old Rationalwikiwiki pages with the "Stalk this user" template on them. Yes, he's still active. But, so what? Spud (talk) 10:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep

1. Still active there. Old guard (talk) 00:11, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
2. Just go and delete every stub. Typhoon (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
3. Hclodge (talk) 11:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
4. --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

O

Conservapedia:Opposition to intelligent design

Keep

1. concise article on key topic. Hclodge (talk) 11:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
2. --Castaigne2 (talk) 19:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Merge/Redirect

1. Move to Conservapedia:Ed Poor. FuzzyCatPotato of the Senseless Jerks (talk/stalk) 22:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
2. Don't delete examples of Ed's endless stupidity. Move it or keep it. Typhoon (talk) 09:38, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
3. Hilarious but could go under Ed's own article. --JorisEnter (talk) 10:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
4. Agreed. It doesn't need a page to itself. It goes onto the Uncle Ed page. Spud (talk) 12:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC)