There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Recipe talk:Snickerdoodles
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wrong wiki - there are cookery wikis aplenty. Anna Livia (talk) 17:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- What's the point of having a recipe namespace if we aren't to cook goat cookies? Seriously, though, I'm hardly the first person to post a legitimate recipe in this namespace. яεvεятεя σғ ωαη∂αℓιsм, ραтяσℓℓεя σғ ε∂ιтs, ΓУППЯ ・「ҭагк」・асђіεѵеϻԑηтѕ・тіме: 18:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- What about [1] and [2] (among other recipes there)? And what about the accountant's cookbook? Anna Livia (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- For reasons I'm betting that almost nobody else here remembers we do, in fact, have a special recipe space. Whether we should have one is perhaps another question.--Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 20:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- The answer to that question is a yes. яεvεятεя σғ ωαη∂αℓιsм, ραтяσℓℓεя σғ ε∂ιтs, ΓУППЯ ・「ҭагк」・асђіεѵеϻԑηтѕ・тіме: 21:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- For reasons I'm betting that almost nobody else here remembers we do, in fact, have a special recipe space. Whether we should have one is perhaps another question.--Bob"Life is short and (insert adjective)" 20:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- What about [1] and [2] (among other recipes there)? And what about the accountant's cookbook? Anna Livia (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)