There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 07:29, 8 November 2014 diff hist +45 Talk:Racial realism →People are basically saying that west africans are not very genetically diverse. What is you guys take on this?
- 07:28, 8 November 2014 diff hist +203 Talk:Racial realism →People are basically saying that west africans are not very genetically diverse. What is you guys take on this?: new section
- 00:48, 6 November 2014 diff hist +99 Talk:Racial realism →Why are the terms caucasoid, mongoloid, and negroid still used in science?
- 00:45, 6 November 2014 diff hist +74 Talk:Racial realism →Why are the terms caucasoid, mongoloid, and negroid still used in science?
- 22:01, 5 November 2014 diff hist +150 Talk:Racial realism →Why are the terms caucasoid, mongoloid, and negroid still used in science?
- 21:51, 5 November 2014 diff hist +45 Talk:Racial realism →Why are the terms caucasoid, mongoloid, and negroid still used in science?
- 21:51, 5 November 2014 diff hist +145 Talk:Racial realism →Why are the terms caucasoid, mongoloid, and negroid still used in science?
- 21:50, 5 November 2014 diff hist +24 Talk:Racial realism →Why are the terms caucasoid, mongoloid, and negroid still used in science?
- 21:48, 5 November 2014 diff hist +161 Talk:Racial realism →Why are the terms caucasoid, mongoloid, and negroid still used in science?
- 20:09, 5 November 2014 diff hist +45 Talk:Racial realism →Why are the terms caucasoid, mongoloid, and negroid still used in science?
- 20:09, 5 November 2014 diff hist +45 Talk:Racial realism →Why are the terms caucasoid, mongoloid, and negroid still used in science?
- 19:49, 5 November 2014 diff hist +140 Talk:Racial realism →Why are the terms caucasoid, mongoloid, and negroid still used in science?: new section
- 02:17, 4 November 2014 diff hist +46 User talk:Psygremlin →Quick question for you about the origins of iron working in sub saharan africa if you can
- 02:16, 4 November 2014 diff hist +9 User talk:Psygremlin →Quick question for you about the origins of iron working in sub saharan africa if you can
- 05:30, 22 October 2014 diff hist +45 Talk:Zimbabwe →Marxist TRASH
- 05:30, 22 October 2014 diff hist +99 Talk:Zimbabwe →Marxist TRASH
- 21:58, 21 October 2014 diff hist -1 Talk:Sumer →First civilisation current
- 21:58, 21 October 2014 diff hist +46 Talk:Sumer →First civilisation
- 21:57, 21 October 2014 diff hist +100 Talk:Sumer →First civilisation
- 21:55, 21 October 2014 diff hist +1 Talk:Africa →Why not do precolonial history to debunk the idea that no civilizations existed in "sub saharan Africa" before that time?
- 21:54, 21 October 2014 diff hist +44 Talk:Africa →Why not do precolonial history to debunk the idea that no civilizations existed in "sub saharan Africa" before that time?
- 21:53, 21 October 2014 diff hist +175 Talk:Africa →Why not do precolonial history to debunk the idea that no civilizations existed in "sub saharan Africa" before that time?
- 04:58, 10 October 2014 diff hist +3,019 User talk:Psygremlin →Quick question for you about the origins of iron working in sub saharan africa if you can: new section
- 04:57, 10 October 2014 diff hist +3,019 User talk:DickTurpis →Quick question for you about the origins of iron working in sub saharan Africa if you can: new section current
- 04:50, 10 October 2014 diff hist +3,019 User talk:David Gerard →Hey quick question for you about the origins of metal in sub saharan africa: new section
- 21:50, 6 October 2014 diff hist +1 Talk:Africa →Why not do precolonial history to debunk the idea that no civilizations existed in "sub saharan Africa" before that time?
- 21:49, 6 October 2014 diff hist +43 m Talk:Africa →Why not do precolonial history to debunk the idea that no civilizations existed in "sub saharan Africa" before that time?
- 21:48, 6 October 2014 diff hist +180 Talk:Africa →Why not do precolonial history to debunk the idea that no civilizations existed in "sub saharan Africa" before that time?: new section
- 03:24, 22 August 2014 diff hist +547 Talk:Racialism →Hey um. I dont have enough expertise to debunk this argument. I need the help of someone smart.: new section