User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 17:56, 18 February 2017 diff hist +538 Talk:Laci Green →Do we need this article
- 16:28, 18 February 2017 diff hist +213 m User talk:FuzzyCatPotato →Hipocrite isn't interested in improving RW.
- 16:05, 6 February 2017 diff hist +10 Balance fallacy
- 15:14, 3 February 2017 diff hist +136 Talk:Men Going Their Own Way →MGTOW: a Form of Gender Dysphoria?
- 18:08, 2 February 2017 diff hist +448 Talk:Laci Green →Let's debunk Laci Green's Critics! Hurray!!: new section
- 18:03, 2 February 2017 diff hist +641 User talk:FuzzyCatPotato →Hipocrite isn't interested in improving RW.
- 17:10, 2 February 2017 diff hist +450 User talk:FuzzyCatPotato →Hipocrite isn't interested in improving RW.
- 17:01, 2 February 2017 diff hist +226 User talk:FuzzyCatPotato →Hipocrite isn't interested in improving RW.
- 16:54, 2 February 2017 diff hist +302 Talk:Laci Green →Let's try this again
- 16:52, 2 February 2017 diff hist +1,060 User talk:FuzzyCatPotato →Hipocrite isn't interested in improving RW.
- 16:42, 2 February 2017 diff hist +517 Talk:Laci Green →Let's try this again
- 16:37, 2 February 2017 diff hist +778 User talk:FuzzyCatPotato →Hipocrite isn't interested in improving RW.: new section
- 16:30, 2 February 2017 diff hist +743 Talk:Laci Green →Let's try this again
- 16:25, 2 February 2017 diff hist +42 m Anita Sarkeesian
- 16:16, 2 February 2017 diff hist +952 m Laci Green These fucking assholes have said something incorrect about our dear Laci Green, we have to point out that it's incorrect. Teach the fucktards a lesson! :-)
- 16:13, 2 February 2017 diff hist +567 Talk:Laci Green →Let's try this again
- 15:20, 2 February 2017 diff hist +181 Talk:Laci Green →Let's try this again
- 10:06, 2 February 2017 diff hist +952 m Laci Green Little changes to prevent Bias by Omission.
- 10:00, 2 February 2017 diff hist +236 User talk:Rational1 →A minor explanation
- 16:02, 25 January 2017 diff hist +119 User talk:Rational1 →Take it from me
- 15:35, 25 January 2017 diff hist +2,762 Talk:Laci Green →Let's try this again
- 09:17, 25 January 2017 diff hist +2,137 Talk:Laci Green →Let's try this again
- 19:37, 24 January 2017 diff hist +648 Talk:Laci Green →What is RationalWiki's ideology?
- 19:23, 24 January 2017 diff hist +141 Talk:Laci Green →What is RationalWiki's ideology?
- 19:14, 24 January 2017 diff hist +389 Talk:Laci Green →What is RationalWiki's ideology?: new section
- 19:08, 24 January 2017 diff hist +149 Talk:Laci Green →The following sections were garbage.
- 18:53, 24 January 2017 diff hist +1 m Laci Green →Persecution by others
- 18:52, 24 January 2017 diff hist +352 Talk:Laci Green →The following sections were garbage.
- 18:49, 24 January 2017 diff hist +1,379 Laci Green Debunked 3 crank ideas as per Hipocrite's post on the talk page
- 18:34, 24 January 2017 diff hist +310 User talk:FuzzyCatPotato →Hipocrite to be placed in vandal bin
- 18:27, 24 January 2017 diff hist +1,475 Laci Green Debunking crank ideas is what this website is for. So, this deserves coverage. If the text is bad, EDIT it, like any PRODUCTIVE user here will do.
- 18:00, 24 January 2017 diff hist +1,475 m Laci Green Undo revision 1787936 by Hipocrite (talk)
- 17:58, 24 January 2017 diff hist +366 User talk:FuzzyCatPotato →Hipocrite to be placed in vandal bin: new section
- 09:55, 23 January 2017 diff hist +1,475 Laci Green Follow our website policies. Do not wipe out sourced sections. This is Plagiarism. Discuss on Talk page.
- 17:27, 22 January 2017 diff hist +424 Laci Green This actually happened, there are tweets from her account showing this
- 17:26, 22 January 2017 diff hist +451 Laci Green Yes, she is dumb
- 17:26, 22 January 2017 diff hist +600 Laci Green Not misinterpretation
- 18:10, 11 January 2017 diff hist +284 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →This article is not convincing enough
- 17:54, 11 January 2017 diff hist +434 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →This article is not convincing enough
- 17:17, 11 January 2017 diff hist +336 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →This article is not convincing enough
- 17:14, 11 January 2017 diff hist +351 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Bias by Omission
- 16:11, 11 January 2017 diff hist +524 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →This article is not convincing enough
- 16:06, 11 January 2017 diff hist +413 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Bias by Omission
- 15:29, 11 January 2017 diff hist +62 m Anita Sarkeesian →"Everything is sexist"
- 15:22, 11 January 2017 diff hist +98 Anita Sarkeesian As pointed out by Hipocrite, her critics are failing to consider the whole context of the quote, and so, there's possibility of "Bias by Omission".
- 15:16, 11 January 2017 diff hist +131 Talk:Anita Sarkeesian →Bias by Omission
- 15:07, 11 January 2017 diff hist +217 Anita Sarkeesian Undo revision 1783729 by David Gerard (talk) As discussed on talk page, any and all crticism against her should be mentioned here, anything else would constitute "Bias by Omission"
- 14:15, 11 January 2017 diff hist +217 Anita Sarkeesian Undo revision 1782549 by ScepticWombat (talk) These 7 sec are what she is heavily critised for. Anyhow, changed link to a video with longer duration.
- 18:41, 8 January 2017 diff hist +216 RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Deepity →Delete
- 18:39, 8 January 2017 diff hist +357 RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Deepity →Keep