There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 03:29, 10 May 2018 diff hist -851 Glenn Greenwald →More asshattery: Not onlynis tghis wrong, but it's wieir5d that thsnsit w;d creic National
- 03:26, 10 May 2018 diff hist -313 Glenn Greenwald →More asshattery: Deleting b/c that is so wrong. As a friend of his family, and knowing the law, this is just a sick denial of how scared all were
- 03:23, 10 May 2018 diff hist -162 Glenn Greenwald →More asshattery: changing the bit about his Iraq war position which I know with certainty. Take it up in talk if you think otherwise, please
- 03:18, 10 May 2018 diff hist -341 Glenn Greenwald →More asshattery: this is all wrong, and I will defend deletion on talk page as one w/ 1st hand knowledge if asked to do so
- 03:16, 10 May 2018 diff hist +22 Glenn Greenwald
- 03:10, 10 May 2018 diff hist +325 Talk:Jimmy Dore →Tell me how to defend
- 02:57, 10 May 2018 diff hist +258 Talk:Jimmy Dore →Tell me how to defend: new section
- 02:49, 10 May 2018 diff hist +1 Jimmy Dore →Syria
- 02:48, 10 May 2018 diff hist -25 Jimmy Dore →Controversies
- 02:45, 10 May 2018 diff hist -126 Jimmy Dore
- 02:36, 10 May 2018 diff hist +792 Jimmy Dore
- 02:11, 10 May 2018 diff hist -6,658 Jimmy Dore working on tbs stiull, removerd stuff about viewership derlciing, b/c it is growing a good deal. Need to address errors in fnon by oner. Ask for discussion on talk page.
- 04:27, 15 November 2017 diff hist +712 Talk:Bernie Sanders →The bottom of this
- 04:18, 15 November 2017 diff hist +719 Talk:Bernie Sanders →Am I The Only One...
- 04:09, 15 November 2017 diff hist +1,328 Talk:Bernie Sanders →Am I The Only One...
- 02:59, 15 November 2017 diff hist +389 Talk:Bernie Sanders →Am I The Only One...
- 02:54, 15 November 2017 diff hist +628 Talk:Bernie Sanders →Am I The Only One...
- 00:22, 15 November 2017 diff hist +355 Talk:Bernie Sanders →Am I The Only One...
- 23:32, 14 November 2017 diff hist +1,362 Talk:Bernie Sanders →Am I The Only One...
- 04:36, 14 November 2017 diff hist +540 Talk:Bernie Sanders →Ridiculous: new section
- 04:31, 14 November 2017 diff hist +78 m Bernie Sanders Reverted edits by CowHouse (talk) to last revision by Tea Sagan
- 04:30, 14 November 2017 diff hist +78 Bernie Sanders belongs in intro graf, will remove below
- 04:28, 14 November 2017 diff hist -383 Bernie Sanders Undo revision 1893503 by CowHouse (talk)yes. ot does
- 04:22, 14 November 2017 diff hist +237 Bernie Sanders →Would Bernie Have Won?
- 04:19, 14 November 2017 diff hist -543 Bernie Sanders →Would Bernie Have Won?
- 04:16, 14 November 2017 diff hist -283 Bernie Sanders Undo revision 1893496 by Jaydogg1994 (talk)
- 04:14, 14 November 2017 diff hist +964 Talk:Bernie Sanders →Intro graph about current info
- 04:02, 14 November 2017 diff hist +165 Bernie Sanders →Would Bernie Have Won?: Berenie NEVER would have done this, this failure to campaign in rust belt states where he's popular
- 03:56, 14 November 2017 diff hist -448 Bernie Sanders →Would Bernie Have Won?: if u want some of that long stuff left, it isn't slaient, but this at least ediyts it into more readable form
- 03:36, 14 November 2017 diff hist +461 Bernie Sanders how is any of this wrong or inappropriate?
- 03:32, 14 November 2017 diff hist -581 Bernie Sanders →Would Bernie Have Won?: some fact-based text from non-centrist POV
- 03:07, 14 November 2017 diff hist +339 User talk:Nerd →I cannot edit: new section
- 02:59, 14 November 2017 diff hist -483 Bernie Sanders Undo revision 1893425 by CowHouse (talk)another member told you my edits worked. please stop
- 02:57, 14 November 2017 diff hist +713 User talk:CowHouse →Thank you
- 02:48, 14 November 2017 diff hist -283 Bernie Sanders →2016 presidential bid: we KNOw Clinton lost, and the best evidence, the best we can know, is that he would not have
- 02:31, 14 November 2017 diff hist +412 User talk:Tea Sagan →Your edits on Bernie Sanders
- 02:24, 14 November 2017 diff hist -483 Bernie Sanders →Would Bernie Have Won?
- 02:05, 14 November 2017 diff hist +225 User talk:Jaydogg1994 →Why?: new section
- 02:03, 14 November 2017 diff hist +292 Talk:Bernie Sanders →Intro graph about current info: new section
- 02:01, 14 November 2017 diff hist +29 Bernie Sanders Undo revision 1893370 by Jaydogg1994 (talk)why? I cited sound facts
- 01:59, 14 November 2017 diff hist +595 User talk:CowHouse →Thank you
- 01:02, 14 November 2017 diff hist -642 Bernie Sanders →Would Bernie Have Won?: Eichenwald is not a reliable source.Will defend in talk page if challenged. GOP wld have gone filthy dirty v. Bernie, but Eichenwald isn't reasonable
- 00:48, 14 November 2017 diff hist +4 m Bernie Sanders →Politics
- 00:45, 14 November 2017 diff hist +636 User talk:CowHouse →Thank you: new section
- 00:29, 14 November 2017 diff hist +113 Bernie Sanders fixing link
- 00:27, 14 November 2017 diff hist -42 Bernie Sanders
- 00:14, 14 November 2017 diff hist +118 Bernie Sanders more election data
- 23:55, 13 November 2017 diff hist +274 Bernie Sanders adding recent election info
- 23:36, 13 November 2017 diff hist +413 Bernie Sanders polling data
- 23:27, 13 November 2017 diff hist -209 Bernie Sanders →Politics: adding more recent sociopolitical context