User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 18:48, 7 October 2019 diff hist +1 m Dungeons & Dragons →How to mess up, fix, mess up again, and fix a brand
- 18:48, 7 October 2019 diff hist +255 Dungeons & Dragons →How to mess up, fix, mess up again, and fix a brand
- 18:37, 7 October 2019 diff hist +1,005 Dungeons & Dragons →How to mess up, fix, mess up again, and fix a brand: Think the recent surge in popularity (or at least visibility) is worth a mention.
- 18:05, 7 October 2019 diff hist -4,543 Dungeons & Dragons How did a 5 paragraph long, almost fanboy-ish, defense of 4th edition made by an anonymous user with no other edits last this long? I'll agree the 4e criticism is overly harsh, but it's better than the alternative presented, which is way out of scope.
- 11:42, 25 June 2016 diff hist -2 Cracked.com
- 23:48, 24 June 2016 diff hist -24 BBC Undo revision 1651074 by 98.237.40.132 (talk) More 4chan garbage from this guy.
- 23:38, 24 June 2016 diff hist -96 Last Week Tonight →Opinions: Honestly, it's a stupid pseudo-meme. He doesn't even use it that often.
- 23:26, 24 June 2016 diff hist -6 Last Week Tonight
- 14:39, 8 April 2016 diff hist -860 RationalWiki:Webshites I feel this needs more info to be relevant here (like if there's a general tendency towards alt. med., racism, homophobia, conspiracy pushing, etc.). If it's just a forum with crappy users, well, those are a dime a dozen.
- 10:49, 3 March 2016 diff hist -1 Varg Vikernes
- 23:41, 14 February 2016 diff hist -7 Dungeons & Dragons →D&D vs. its own players
- 23:40, 14 February 2016 diff hist +21 Dungeons & Dragons
- 23:33, 14 February 2016 diff hist +32 Dungeons & Dragons Trying to have this make more sense in the article, because it doesn't logically follow and gets in the way of the part explaining the SRD stuff.
- 11:34, 10 February 2016 diff hist -186 RationalWiki:Webshites It's already on here.
- 09:15, 29 January 2016 diff hist +34 Science fiction
- 10:07, 27 January 2016 diff hist +10 Dungeons & Dragons
- 09:56, 27 January 2016 diff hist +88 Talk:Dungeons & Dragons
- 09:55, 23 January 2016 diff hist -727 Dungeons & Dragons Unbelievable. Again, how does giving people settings they like equal to "D&D vs its own players"? It's completely out of place on this article as was already discussed.
- 00:33, 2 November 2015 diff hist +305 Talk:Dungeons & Dragons →The "D&D vs. its own players" edits
- 00:19, 2 November 2015 diff hist +554 Talk:Dungeons & Dragons
- 00:06, 2 November 2015 diff hist +3,257 Talk:Dungeons & Dragons
- 21:57, 1 November 2015 diff hist +12 Dungeons & Dragons →D&D vs. its own players
- 10:29, 1 November 2015 diff hist -1,817 Dungeons & Dragons This is all irrelevant here and based on your opinions that not everyone agrees with. People would complain in they went in the other direction as well. And seriously, these complaints about the magic system are ridiculous.
- 20:53, 10 October 2015 diff hist +358 Varg Vikernes Not really much about the gameplay in the article. Also, not really sure about the release date. Info is scarce, but his blog has second edition errata from 2014.
- 20:17, 10 October 2015 diff hist +1 m Varg Vikernes
- 11:47, 10 October 2015 diff hist +51 Varg Vikernes
- 11:30, 13 September 2015 diff hist +324 Dungeons & Dragons Didn't mean to delete this part.
- 11:15, 13 September 2015 diff hist -2,223 Dungeons & Dragons Why is any of this important to this section (or even this site at all). So players played in settings that appealed to them (many of which are much more interesting than the core setting. So what?
- 20:48, 4 September 2015 diff hist -7 Dungeons & Dragons I'm pretty sure wizards and related classes still, more or less, follow the Vancian system.
- 20:33, 4 September 2015 diff hist -869 Dungeons & Dragons Most players are happy to have the various settings. Don't think it's worth mentioning a minority. Also, "high magic" existed in other media existed long before those anime shows, and I strongly doubt enough gamers have even heard of those shows.
- 20:24, 4 September 2015 diff hist -143 Dungeons & Dragons Undo revision 1521719 by 216.223.234.176 (talk) The rewrite seems really confusing. Sorry.
- 08:56, 13 February 2015 diff hist -52 RationalWiki:Webshites Undo revision 1423916 by MadmanJohnson (talk) Doesn't need to be listed twice
- 11:54, 15 December 2014 diff hist -358 Inverse stopped clock http://www.stephenfry.com/2010/11/04/silliness/ - Whether his claims are believable or not is up to the reader, but it's better to err on the side of caution on these things.
- 11:25, 16 November 2014 diff hist +244 Talk:Dubai →First-world-quality world citizen current
- 10:21, 5 November 2014 diff hist -3 m But that was the Old Testament →Intolerance/Misogyny
- 10:19, 5 November 2014 diff hist +2 m But that was the Old Testament →Intolerance/Misogyny
- 20:26, 29 September 2014 diff hist -1 Psychokinesis →As the stuff of horror movies
- 13:50, 23 September 2014 diff hist -47 RationalWiki:Webshites →Sometimes shameful: If you're putting it in this section, you need to explain what we need to watch out for. I took a quick look and saw support for GMOs against people who are opposed to the very concept of it, which is rare.
- 01:00, 15 September 2014 diff hist -49 Punk
- 00:58, 15 September 2014 diff hist -2 Punk Looks like Cyberpunk was originally in it's own section, but somewhere down the line, someone confused them for hardcore punk subgenres.
- 21:50, 14 September 2014 diff hist +878 Punk →Street Punk
- 21:16, 14 September 2014 diff hist +2,026 Talk:Punk →A few points (June 2011)
- 20:14, 14 September 2014 diff hist +183 Punk →Hardcore punk
- 12:44, 12 September 2014 diff hist -179 RationalWiki:Webshites →Sometimes shameful: Actually, we already have a list of Youtube vloggers you can use for specific channels.
- 12:38, 12 September 2014 diff hist 0 RationalWiki:Webshites I don't think sites like that should be listed, but if we are then this is the right category for it. Soon we'll list every forum that has a token loonie even if no one takes him/her seriously and Google, for being able to look that stuff up.
- 22:08, 28 August 2014 diff hist +18 Heavy metal →Metal Archives: Many of the things mentioned here were either never true or haven't been true since, like, 2004.
- 21:46, 28 August 2014 diff hist +5 Heavy metal →Metal Archives
- 18:39, 13 August 2014 diff hist +82 RationalWiki:Saloon bar →PZ
- 18:38, 13 August 2014 diff hist +222 RationalWiki:Saloon bar →PZ
- 11:15, 5 July 2014 diff hist +677 Talk:Roland Emmerich