Talk:ACS:Law
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Comment[edit]
Pretty good start! I engaged in some housekeeping activities, per usual. ħuman 02:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 08:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ahem! <ref>http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-566663</ref> goeth nowhere. Unlike this one 10:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- It does for me:
- Ahem! <ref>http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-566663</ref> goeth nowhere. Unlike this one 10:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
“”PI aims to pursue UK law firm for data breach
27/09/2010 Law firm that tracks internet users exposes confidential information |
- What are you getting? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 10:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, it's because of the square brackets in the URL. I nowiki'd it to format it correctly but the link is now text only. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 10:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- What are you getting? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 10:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
This was featured on Breakfast this morning but it all hinged on the data and privacy issues, there was nothing about ACS:Law's business practices. ГенгисGum disease 10:31, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Can the link be fixed using code for the square brackets? [ and ] I think? ħuman 21:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Bronze[edit]
Seems quite stable now. How about a brain? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 18:38, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, why not? --Sir Onion Kneel before my vegetable might! 18:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)