Talk:ACS:Law

	This Law related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Comment

Pretty good start! I engaged in some housekeeping activities, per usual. ħuman 02:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 08:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Ahem! <ref>http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-566663</ref> goeth nowhere. Unlike this one 10:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

It does for me:

“”PI aims to pursue UK law firm for data breach 27/09/2010 Law firm that tracks internet users exposes confidential information

What are you getting? Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 10:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Ah, it's because of the square brackets in the URL. I nowiki'd it to format it correctly but the link is now text only. Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 10:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

This was featured on Breakfast this morning but it all hinged on the data and privacy issues, there was nothing about ACS:Law's business practices. Генгис^{Is the Pope a Catholic?} 10:31, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Can the link be fixed using code for the square brackets? [ and ] I think? ħuman 21:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Bronze

Seems quite stable now. How about a brain? Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 18:38, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, why not? --Onion <talk> 18:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)