There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:ACS:Law
Comment[edit]
Pretty good start! I engaged in some housekeeping activities, per usual. ħuman 02:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 08:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ahem! <ref>http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-566663</ref> goeth nowhere. Unlike this one 10:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- It does for me:
- Ahem! <ref>http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-566663</ref> goeth nowhere. Unlike this one 10:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
“”PI aims to pursue UK law firm for data breach
27/09/2010 Law firm that tracks internet users exposes confidential information |
- What are you getting? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 10:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, it's because of the square brackets in the URL. I nowiki'd it to format it correctly but the link is now text only. CrundyTalk nerdy to me 10:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- What are you getting? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 10:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
This was featured on Breakfast this morning but it all hinged on the data and privacy issues, there was nothing about ACS:Law's business practices. ГенгисIs the Pope a Catholic? 10:31, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Can the link be fixed using code for the square brackets? [ and ] I think? ħuman
21:26, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Bronze[edit]
Seems quite stable now. How about a brain? CrundyTalk nerdy to me 18:38, 3 October 2010 (UTC)