Talk:Amitakh Stanford

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon ufology.svg

This Ufology related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


crank stub[edit]

This is currently a crappy stub, but the crack on those webpages is ezquisite. Also, I suspect this will attract hits - David Gerard (talk) 00:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Jesus wept that's a whole world of craziness going on there. Get yourself a stiff drink and take the afternoon off. Concernedresident omg!!! ponies!!! 00:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Apparently aliens really care about the World Cup.[1] This woman is brilliant. ThunderkatzHo! 00:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Fortean Times[edit]

There was apparently a very nice article on Amitakh in Fortean Times five or so years ago. My gf has only just subscribed to FT again recently and doesn't have the issue with Amitakh, and the article isn't online anywhere. Does anyone have a stack of Fortean Times to hand? - David Gerard (talk) 23:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

ED page[edit]

The ED article on Amitakh was the bestest article ever, and disappeared with ED. There's a copy here - the material needs incorporating into this one - David Gerard (talk) 07:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Maybe you might want to rethink your ideas.[edit]

I'm truly sorry to say but I feel that you are on a more disassociated path than on one that is of 'pure light' or of much 'Truth' ..... in any way. You can't truly think ..... for if you actually 'believe' some of your 'enlightened' words I feel that you would therefore end up 'believing' that the sky is green .....and it is not, it is blue and many shades of blue for that matter.

Understandably all people have it in their right to have their connection to 'What Is' as their own personal connection. How One perceives their connection is their own. That is the way it is to be.

That is ..... what is ..... the main purpose of doing One's inner work and finding One's true connection between the 'True Self' and 'The One Who Began It All' - anyone and all at this point can use any of the names that have been given to this Entity from around our world - it doesn't really matter.

But to say that Whom Ever these Messengers were - that they are doing such mind stuff to humans on those levels is somewhat and very truly - very hard to think of.

I personally prefer to find my Truth .....than to believe anything I hear or read - set aside taking most things with grains of salt and working through all the different hypotheses set out ..... to find at least a thread of Truth.

But to spell out such abuses in such a descriptive way is quite simply unappealing. You are basing your premises on no actual scientific findings..... whatsoever and coming to conclusions that are mearly 'what you believe to be'..... which may not be any where near the 'Truth'.

It is one thing to express One's ideas in a way that will give people 'something to think about' ..... which is a good thing. We should be well rounded in our knowledge and take into account the many facets of different ideas - then at least try to make our own conclusion to the best of our ability - but that is still to find the 'Truth' .....

The 'Truth' is information that has been found to have a basis of colaborated, well defined descriptions and procedures/conclusions that more than just One person has come to by way of reasoning and evidence.

That to which has lasted the test of time and space.

Our reality is just that. We are to live now, with love and caring. Abuse is not conducive to our well-being as humans.

Humans are not resilient in any way, but nothing is resilient for that matter. There is not One thing that goes back to exactly it's true form once disturbed in any way. Even if I wave my hand through the air, the molecules never return to the exact space and or time that they were in before I waved my hand.

So we as humans must take two words out of our vocabulary: Believe and Resilient.

Anyone can believe anything at anytime. If a person is told something enough they will 'believe' it even if it has no 'Truth' attached to it whatsoever.

and No One is ( or nothing is ) resilient. There is nothing in this universe that actually returns to it's former self once disrupted, abused and or tampered with in any way.

The word resilient is going back to it's original form. Springing back, elastic etc..... even an elastic band once used begins it's journey to inevitably breaking down and in the end breaking under the pressure of being stretched time and time again.

I think you might want to rethink your position and maybe take some time to look a bit more at your 'ideas'. That's all. Thank you for the opportunity to use this forum, it is much appreciated. — Unsigned, by: TLOS / talk / contribs


What the fuck was that up there? — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs (signed by bot) 17:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Xe-a-twelve seems to be gambling spam. — Unsigned, by: / talk / contribs 02:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)