There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Author
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mission[edit]
Mission? 17:07, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ohhhh, this could be SOOOO good. Take some Bahktin, some Wittgenstein, and Foucault (ce n'est pas une pipe) and I'll have you doubting everything you every thought you knew about who wrote something. But this article is crap. lol. if you decide to delete it, would you stick it in my userspace, so i can play with it after November elections?
GodotThe Peyote God awaits 17:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- S,F,W I'll let it live a while longer.
17:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- hmm. Tytalk 21:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm indeed. Blue (pester) 02:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Delete perhaps? Тytalk 02:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Good Goat. I know I keep moaning that RW is not an encyclopedia, but this is not even that - it's almost a dictionary entry. I'll move it to WfG's userspace and leave her a mess. Sophiebecause liberals 15:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete perhaps? Тytalk 02:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm indeed. Blue (pester) 02:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- hmm. Tytalk 21:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- S,F,W I'll let it live a while longer.
Since Author redirects here[edit]
... shouldn't this be in mainspace? Cømяade FυzzчCαтPøтαтø (talk/stalk) 01:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC)