Talk:Badger's Law

This seems broadly true

I wonder if people who reject mainstream science are simply more likely to appeal to concepts like "TRUTH". Whereas a ton of skeptical sites have "science" or "skeptic" in their URL somewhere. FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 18:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Boredatwork's Law

Any RationalWiki user with "rational" in their username is anything but. Boredatwork (talk) 13:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I've seen a few examples of this… --Luigifan18 (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Speculation on the cause?

I'm considering adding a sentence or two to the intro to speculate on the underlying reason behind Badger's Law; my hypothesis is the webshite designers who make Badger's Law content tending to confuse their own worldviews with objective truth and not bothering to do any research or experimentation that could disprove said worldview. I don't know if we can go any further in-depth than that, though. Has Badger's Law been formally analyzed by actual (social) scientists? --Luigifan18 (talk) 16:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)