Talk:Br3aking Porn

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon sex.svg

This Sexuality related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Steelbrain.png

Interesting[edit]

This group looks interesting and on mission. Let's deal with them on our terms, instead of being fanboys about how they were "pwned" (by the way, adults don't write like that) by some cheetos-eating, Mountain-Dew drinking vlogger living in someone's basement. P-Foster Talk "Go get Ace" 15:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Wow, you're back. I guess that means someone is about to slide through every single fucking edit of mine and (if possible) revert it, again. By the way, we don't want to put a banner calling TJ a "cheetos-eating, Mountain-Dew drinking vlogger living in someone's basement" on the top of RW so you must see it everytime you enter the page? FANBOYISM!
I used "pwned" because TJ also uses the term "pwned." -- DasRationalpersone Socks cat 1.JPG (Annoy me!) 17:27, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Besides, TJ's videos are practically the only publicity they got besides their own page. -- DasRationalpersone Socks cat 1.JPG (Annoy me!) 17:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
So then let's give them more publicity with our own smart, clever, creative brand of critique instead of just being a clearing house for some other guy's work. We're smarter and can do better, and it's the kind of thing that's totally on mission for us. Also, I never wen away. I've been proofreading and editing your contributions all along. Get with the program.

P-Foster Talk "Go get Ace" 19:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm convinced! Redchuck.gif ГенгисYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.Moderator 15:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The Poem[edit]

There once was a teen against porn,
who sat all day forlorn,
no matter how he prayed, it wouldn't go away
and he pulled all night on his horn.
TheAmazingAtheist

Why can't this be included? If this can't be, well, nothing can be in any article. We can just say "no one cares what x thinks" and remove all citations at the top of all pages. -- DasRationalpersone Socks cat 1.JPG (Annoy me!) 15:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

It's stupid, it's boring, and most importantly, we should be creating our own original snark, not simply repeating other people's snark. Find something original and clever of your own to say instead of repeating what some random vlogger has to say. P-Foster Talk "a cheetos-eating, Mountain-Dew drinking vlogger living in someone's basement." 15:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
If "TheAmazingAtheist" wouldn't be signed under the poem, it would probably still be up. -- DasRationalpersone Socks cat 1.JPG (Annoy me!) 15:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Maybe. But you fucked up and now we know it's not original. Look how we already took your article that basically read "Br3aking Porn and something about the Amazing Atheist" and actually made something a little bit snarky and a little bit funny and a whole lot smarter than what you started with. Try to add to that process, not take away from it. Be original. It counts. P-Foster Talk "a cheetos-eating, Mountain-Dew drinking vlogger living in someone's basement." 15:29, 20 January 2012 (UTC)