There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War
Misrepresented[edit]
@Ephrom: Wrongheaded as Buchanan is, I think the page badly misrepresents Buchanan's argument. First, the Allies did not invade Germany, they occupied Germany at the end of the war due to non-surrender; I rather doubt that Buchanan claimed that the Allies invaded Germany. Second, most of Buchanan's claims about the war being unnecessary are based on World War I and the Treaty of Versailles. This is not made clear on the page. Bongolian (talk) 06:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
@Bongolian: I fixed that mistake (thanks for pointing that out, by the way) and will include a section summarizing those claims later today.Ephrom
Intimations of war[edit]
From 'various research and reading' it is clear that some people (at least) were considering that there might be a European war 'at some point' by the mid-1930s. (I do not have the details to hand - long ago and a previous computer etc.)
Quite possibly *if Hitler had not been present/had been less militant* there might have been a tripartite Europe - Communist (Stalin etc), democratic (of various flavours) and 'right wing authoritarian' (in Europe - Franco, Salazar, Mussolini, and some of the South American states. Anna Livia (talk) 12:04, 27 June 2023 (UTC)