|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:City Data
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This Internet related article has been assessed as SIGNIFICANTLY PROBLEMATIC in one or more ways. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information. |
| ||
| ||||
Delete[edit]
Yea[edit]
Nay[edit]
Nay for me, or "BAaaaA" in goat, but I'm biased. ~ Subsound ~ 01:37, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Goat[edit]
Discussion[edit]
Um, and what is the point of this article? ħuman
05:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Point #2 on the main page "Documenting the full range of crank ideas", including where people vomit them onto the world. Can't think of many more cranky places then this, or places like "The Economic Collapse Blog". You could also roll Blogs 4 Brownback, Pajamas Media, and Libertapedia into the bucket of places nutters like to congregate. ~ Subsound ~ 18:33, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think you over-value the commentary here. Might want to put the "on mission" reason in the opening sentence? If you can find one? ħuman 06:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, on mission of documenting crank ideas is including the places where those crank ideas like to live. Several websites are included in the same fashion (see internal links above). I thought this was already pointed out. I am sorry there was a need to repeat myself because it was not made clear above. ~ Subsound ~ 13:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- The point Human is trying to made is that the article lacks structure and looks like a series of lists. The introduction - that is, the first few sentences - should make clear what is this site and how it is relevant to RW's mission.--ZooGuard (talk) 08:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Ah okay, that makes a great deal more sense. I can fix it up. Thank you very much for the additional explanation! ~ Subsound ~ 17:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hopefully that helps it out a bit. ~ Subsound ~ 04:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- It's a bit better, yes. Thanks Zooguard for explaining what I meant. Subsound, can you make your sig have a link to your user and/or talk page please? Keep massaging that text if you can. Peace. ħuman 02:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- It's a bit better, yes. Thanks Zooguard for explaining what I meant. Subsound, can you make your sig have a link to your user and/or talk page please? Keep massaging that text if you can. Peace. ħuman
- Hopefully that helps it out a bit. ~ Subsound ~ 04:15, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Ah okay, that makes a great deal more sense. I can fix it up. Thank you very much for the additional explanation! ~ Subsound ~ 17:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- The point Human is trying to made is that the article lacks structure and looks like a series of lists. The introduction - that is, the first few sentences - should make clear what is this site and how it is relevant to RW's mission.--ZooGuard (talk) 08:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, on mission of documenting crank ideas is including the places where those crank ideas like to live. Several websites are included in the same fashion (see internal links above). I thought this was already pointed out. I am sorry there was a need to repeat myself because it was not made clear above. ~ Subsound ~ 13:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- I think you over-value the commentary here. Might want to put the "on mission" reason in the opening sentence? If you can find one? ħuman
Some BoN posted a link a dozen times[edit]
http://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/1952061-september-10-victory.html [...] — Unsigned, by: 174.25.48.75 / talk 06:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)