Talk:Conservapedia

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Conservlogo late april.png

This Conservapedia related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png
Editorial notes

Incoherent, lumpy, jargon-filled and not a good intro to an outsider. We need this article to be really good because we are the go-to site on Conservapedia.[dubious]

Archives for this talk page: , (new)


What Conservapedia needs[edit]

... is a good dose of creativity (as distinct from Creationism), regular doses of the 'more interesting, 'Er What?' and lurid' chapters of the Bible, BibleCelebrityGossip (tm), irony traps, and exposure to the inherent contradictions in their arguments, until until they get into a mirror maze and vanish/undergo spontaneous combustion. — Unsigned, by: 212.85.6.26 / talk / contribs

Where's Conservapedia's true quote that says "sentences should not be facts."?[edit]

Where is the citations of Convervapedia's quote that says "sentences should not be facts? I can't find it in this article because there is no citation for it. Please, cite or give proof that this is Conservapedia's true quote "sentences should not be facts". Cite the proof here:

— Unsigned, by: Coolguy212 / talk / contribs

1990'sguy[edit]

He banned me for putting science in their starlight problem article! I'm gonna go to the saloon bar and whine. — Unsigned, by: Doublethink / talk / contribs

Violating Terms of Service Openly[edit]

One of the most prolific members of Conservapedia is a user called Conservative. Recently they have begun to open violate the terms of service of an online web traffic analysis firm SimilarWeb, by displaying the metrics which are otherwise only meant for personal use on the Conservapedia website.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_child_pornography#RationalWiki.2C_pornography_and_pedophilia

This is use is very much against SimilarWeb's TOS (available here: https://www.similarweb.com/corp/legal/terms/) which state clearly that

"(i) give, sell, rent, lease, timeshare, sublicense, disclose, publish, assign, market, sell, display, transmit, broadcast, transfer or distribute any portion of the Platform, Site or Applications to any third party;"

I wonder if there's a way we can mess with Conservapedia using this? — Unsigned, by: StagCodeHoarder / talk / contribs

There's ways in which RationalWiki violates the TOS of Linode and Web.com, doubtful that either would do squat if an abuse report were sent however. These places have bigger fish to fry than RW or CP. 71.208.x.x (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2022 (UTC) Also there's crap tons of Nintendo IP illegally hosted on RW. Something to think about before tossing rocks around. 71.208.x.x (talk) 14:47, 14 May 2022 (UTC)